SekeRob's Comments
Changeset | When | Comment |
---|---|---|
142023710 | almost 2 years ago | Hi, Corrected the construction tagging, which are always for ways
Question I have on the tunnels is, are these old railway tunnels completely forgotten or newly drilled ones? Saw there was some work on the Ortona end of the seaside cycleway but never noticed anything on the Lido Riccio side. Is there some target date for completion of this project? Thanks & ciao |
138416159 | almost 2 years ago | When visiting the gate was thoroughly locked and construction sign was up, hence entrance by permit (for the construction workers). It's a bit odd this is part of the cycle route when no route is leading to it. |
141938278 | almost 2 years ago | The natural=riverbed tag used is seemingly a deprecated one. See osm.wiki/Tag%3Anatural%3Driverbed for new tagging recommendation |
141826594 | almost 2 years ago | Gran Sasso/Imperatore lanuse/cover, reclass fell to needle forest (planted) w/ landslide zones. |
140262614 | almost 2 years ago | Ciao Marco Si prega di leggere il wiki degli indirizzi specifico per l'Italia. I numeri civici/indirizzi si trovano nel punto in cui si trova l'ingresso in un nodo separato. ciao |
141693952 | almost 2 years ago | Hi, your 'y' edit, a meaningless comment, has been cancelled as it caused too many problems, building and highway dragging inclusive. ciao |
141649653 | almost 2 years ago | Hi, made is set of corrections with osm.org/changeset/141672956 as your forest had disappeared from view, ciao |
141288063 | almost 2 years ago | ID Editor is actually very good at breaking multipolygon relations and not telling it is as it does not download the whole of the relations worked on. I'd recommend you try out JOSM combined with the RelToolbox (Relation Validation plugin). It allows easy downloading of complete relations and will give a detail validation error/warning list of items needing fixing prior to saving. Quite a few roles were missing here as were many sections of inner area not made member. Also whole multipolygons were made inner to the forest. Can't do that, the outlines of the MP/SP needs selecting and made inner. If an MP is not properly closed or self intersecting it will tell you and where in the Validator pane. cheers |
141270168 | almost 2 years ago | Hi, Fixed some of your WIP
Think the forest needs splitting along the major roads. ciao |
140905995 | almost 2 years ago | Right, from aerial there's no way this is a foot/bike only 'path' with those street_side parkings not to speak of the bus stops. |
140881851 | almost 2 years ago | See https://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/en/map/#item=1170&zoom=9&lat=46.105&lon=11.921&level=3&tags=&fixable=&issue_uuid=184a2777-8622-b4d2-19ba-3f240b2f64cd for the countless double polygons needing cleaning |
140693054 | almost 2 years ago | See your name on an edit in Ukraine... The link below confirms the name:it
Don't know why the 'highest point' value on that page is noting 3333 when it's article headed as 3337. The rock pile on top :? Never understood the proximity thing too some insisting as tagging on peaks. You have me blessing to put the reverted values back Cheers |
140570003 | almost 2 years ago | Hi, Please be aware of this revert made by a now deleted account. |
140693054 | almost 2 years ago | hmmm, mountain peak mapped by a now deleted account, then info is added which as the change set states 'CONFIRMED' by a wikipedia page and a wikidata link, then those tag adds are reverted by VEGETATION MAH BOIIIIIIIIIIIIIS who's account is now also deleted (the same as the first delete?). Wikidata is too unreliable now? Very dubious revert. |
140677983 | almost 2 years ago | Hi Converting parking nodes to areas comes with additional tagging requirements
annd if not streetside you have to map a service way to it and parking_aisles. A few wikis to read and apply
A parking as a node is still correct mapping so whoever set this up did not do his/her homework ciao So, another thoroughly broken maproulette race. |
140407500 | almost 2 years ago | If you like dragging nodes around moving objects aligned to one set of imagery to another set of imagery you may, whether it adds is in the eye of the beholder. Just don't leave things broken like your previous edit here. Now the ways and gate you added analysis as... broken. Here your gate tags don't match that what's tagged on the service way (which is not oneway for everyone), something you do frequently, same as not adding direction on stop spots, traffic signals and so on, and parking areas that are not connected to a way directly need to be qualified too in some way so routers can get a way to them.
caio |
140416163 | almost 2 years ago | Ciao e benvenuto su OSM Un'osservazione degna di nota è che i tuoi edifici hanno un aspetto scadente. L'obiettivo è quello di mappare esattamente' i contorni. Presta attenzione anche al fatto che gli edifici non si trovino sopra gli alberi e le strade. Buona mappatura |
140390611 | almost 2 years ago | Hi, you keep fixing stuff that aint broken, the routing on the east stations of the motorway is now completely unpassable according QA. Also mapping individual parking spaces is a perfect valid way of mapping, in fact some mappers don't do anything else, so I will run a revert on this as I have no intend to go look what you broke. Have a nice day |
140273837 | almost 2 years ago | Ciao e benvenuto su OSM Quando si mappano gli edifici si prega di prestare maggiore attenzione alla precisione nel tracciare i contorni. Inoltre, è meglio usare le immagini ESRI come sfondo, poiché BING ha un offset e una torsione. Quando correggi i nomi delle strade, controlla di aver applicato la correzione a tutte le sezioni di strada con lo stesso nome. Questo influisce anche sugli indirizzi, quindi anche questi devono essere controllati quando si fa riferimento alla strada con il nome modificato. Buona mappatura |
140305606 | almost 2 years ago | PS uses JOSM 18622 so not sure how this got past the pre-save validator. |