E perché hai cancellato queste informazioni?
osm.org/way/1311801945

Ciao

Ti prego di SMETTERE di eliminare oggetti, modificarli e altro senza commentare specificamente nel tuo set di modifiche PERCHÉ stai eliminando oggetti. Se non sai come riparare qualcosa che hai rotto, usa il pulsante di annullamento in alto a destra, ma non salvare oggetti che hai rotto.

(Hi,

Kindly STOP deleting objects, mangling them and more without specifically commenting in your edit set WHY you are deleting object. If you do not know how to fix something you broke use the reverse button right top, but don't save objects you broke.)

Grazie

Ciao,

Alcune correzioni al tuo tagging:
osm.org/changeset/162776672

Don't know why that papyrus info was deleted and turned into a single plant with 1 tag... you may want to check with the deleter as to why. osm.org/changeset/162507642

errata: The video is attached to this object osm.org/way/1311955083#map=18/42.316141/13.310682

Hi,

Apologies. The longer viaduct in the motorway section, Fornaca west, was blown up in 2022 for a new one, seismic proof, video in my edit. Nobody bothered to adapt the road routing and accesses till now, so I did. By the looks it will be still a while, the Fornaca east now oneway=no . It's not an extremely busy motorway so the usual, taking their time. Forgot about FB routes.

Mea Maxima Culpa
cheers

Hi,

Is there now somewhere a place holder node to carry all these area tags... my overpass can't seems to find any, and Adriatic I've never heard of being a contentious name.

chrs

Since I still had the data set from last week, just refreshed that coastline section, then seeing there were border imports along that coastline breaking at least 5 area relation, done by the CS prior to Filo's doing by this account osm.org/user/Import%20DGU%20borders, few hundred edit, guaranteed success. This is 1 mapper scale above me.

Hi,

Actually think that Filo edit should have been reverted as the Adriatic coastline boundary is broken in the Volosko corner in multiple sections, since highlighted in OSM Inspector. Not a week ago I spent hours loading the Adriatic relations to correct it, most time wasted on loading the whole A relation into JOSM memory to verify all was properly closed. Oh will, version 1011 now, mopping with the watertap open.

ciao

Ciao, ho corretto la relazione del Castello in modo che tutto appaia correttamente, tranne per il fatto che c'era un conflitto di etichette del sidewalk sull'edificio del castello che ho dovuto rimuovere. Sospetto che il sidewalk o il camminamento dovessero seguire lungo la parte superiore delle mura del castello. Sicuramente deve essere disegnato separatamente. Così sai, come ultimo editore della relazione del castello. Le modifiche che puoi trovare in questo CS:

osm.org/changeset/161670716

saluti

Is the crossing here on a traffic_calming=table ???

Hi,

Don't know why you keep adding nodes to circles, buildings, watertowers, roundabouts, wastewater clarifiers and the like over and above what the editors auto-calculate depending on the size of the ring as good enough to get a fluid round ring in map rendering, but it's being noticed. Adds zero value to the map.

cheers

PS There's the record keeper who put 400 on a larger roundabout... I apply reversal or simplify, only when I stumble on them ,O)

Hi,

You're the third person to revert cycleways/roads this same mapper has imported from GPX top of existing ways. Wrote him a note, got a reply back seemingly not understanding. This looks an awful lot like he did the same tracks again.

cheers

ciao,

alcune correzioni della tua modifica

osm.org/changeset/161978347#map=19/42.600515/14.072403

felice mappatura

Updt. Every cm is still there, now a segregated cycleway witb a 90 degrees connsction. The geometry ill work over

BTW, one ethos in OSM is preserving chronology, turn restrictions can be edited, you don't delete and create new ones. Here the razed:highway lifecycle tag would have applied. This signals to the next mapper something changed. I fall foul of this rule myself, still, but since someone deleted new buildings and mapped the demolished ones back I keep old buildings and add more tags to signal it was and nolonger is.

Your CS comments are not very informational, and when there are more mappers in the same area it's all the more important. Reminds me of that roundabout you deleted then remapped on Marconi when it was gone. That's a true candidate for such tagging excluding it from routers but retaining it for mappers. It would have prevented this duh. I'll check the geometry in while. It continues to be a dangerous junction for cyclists, so i actually leave the track and go on the road there for more visibility both ways regardless of the sign for obligatory use. Seen a scooter there hit by car.... scooter drivers behavior not exactly secure many a time so who was to blame I cant say.

BTW the disused Sangritaria passing Casoli... long overdue to get the abandoned tag prefix. In parts the rail is really gone. 57 level crossings needing updating since the installations are disabled.

Corrections. osm.org/changeset/161851649

The building in question is identical in size in Bing & Mapbox, latter though suffering from heavy fog world wide. As for mapping areas, I refer you to the Wiki that explains how to map an area with an inner space, where the building is. In ALL imagery there's a fringe around the building. If there is not in real life then the cutout is not even needed, just plump the building on. Since there's no discernable way to the building that would be OK

(In sources we may not us for mapping the building is also still the same fully enveloped by grass, looking like a utlility service building)

Obviously if the Mapbox imagery is newer v.v. particulars of new/replaced buildings and new/changed roads you make the best of it,

For aligning the imagery in ID Editor, here a video of several found on youtube explaining this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8s-pN6gpY7w

Otherwise happy mapping and stay cool.

You mean to say that roundabout bypass is nolonger there? It's not what my memory says of last weeks crossing onto Pindaro, could have been on autopilot. I'll include it in todays giro and fix it next.

In seguito al mio precedente commento, ho informato la Comunità Italiana di questo fatto e sono stato informato che altri “elementi validi” sono stati cancellati da voi. Per favore, visitate e spiegate lì.

https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/un-gran-numero-di-cancellazioni-di-modo-sconcertante/124880