Do not quite understand why the roundabout has to be a single circle when e.g. the bus routes passing do not us/touch certain sections. Of all the existing, none in fact seem to go across the piece between the northern side on and off of Corso Umberto I. Also, this has potential of breaking on and off turn restrictions. E.g. 16 Montesilvano FS comes off Gaspari, goes on and off again northbound only using half the roundabout.
Plz elucidate.

Hi,
I'm afraid the tagging did not turn quite as uniform as you intended on ref, ncn & network as you may have intended, and that's me not even exhaustively comparing, but thanks anyway for fixing the shortcomings.
Ciao

Why am I seeing this in my square mile on the Fiume Pescara? Ah yes, 1 changeset that has a dozen changes in the deep south of Reggio Calabria and then adds one more near Milan. Kindly split up your sets next time. Many mappers will thank you.

I'll think of that next time when adding toll gates and gantries, to check the routing.

Thx.

I've corr. the direction.

Went to look with sat imagery and streetview. The added direction was added pointing 180 degrees opposite how it's painted on the road.

Hi,

Me again, if you have not seen my comment to a change you made to a T.Sign in Pescara, you are demonstrating the exact pitfall on this change. The 'forward' beam now points towards Anzaven where logically it should be pointing towards Petricelli, up.Are you sure that's right?
cheers

Hi, I've actually stopped using forward/backward on non-one way roads and put the signs to the side (as was advised to do by a presumed expert), which forces the use of degrees of view. Right now I've after 3300 edits still not figured out what forward/backward is on both way roads. Sometimes forward points east, sometimes forward points west. Also found out if I put direction and traffic_sign:direction on same node it actually ignores the direction= tag. Suppose that's #maproulette for me.
cheers

Actually would not know where I copy/pasted this from, but suppose the conditional tag was too much of the good. Guess the note I left asking to check can be closed with this.

Thank you for including everyone from Frankfurt am Main to South Rwanda near Burundi in your change set.. I'm sure that that was not the idea, so please next time would you kindly make and save your edits on a per-country basis.
Many thanks in advance.

Hi FixFighter

I'm getting a warning in the big error report "Inconsistent tagging of construction". Don't know when the filobus will ride, but apart from seeing a demo version on Piazza Salotto, think Pescara never bought them. The electrical installation is ready as are the traffic signal controls, was briefly powered i saw notices for at 700 volts. Anyway, I've done quite a bit of editing on the full length of the Strada Parco or Parco Strada as described on Facebook, and today also added some filobus tags and made cycle/foot permissive, at least never seen patrolling cops stop anyone. May change in the future off course.
ciao :O)

Read about putting signs in the physical position a few days ago and there being no explicit right or wrong putting them on the road. Trouble is, if you put them on the side, the forward/backward becomes useless. most notably at roundabouts there are typically 3 signs that come together, yield, roundabout and no_entry for those asleep at the wheel, so putting them on the one way lane makes it easy to say forward/backward for the party whom it should affect. Anyway, the wiki osm.wiki/Key:traffic_sign leaves it to me entirely open if put on a road node or on the side of the road.

Someone with well over 100k change sets to his name came by one of mine as OSMI threw a fit at a turn restriction because I had managed to put it in twice. The person removed 1, so I'm left with the impression that the system has seeming tolerances. I'll read your linked a articles to see if other lights come on.
cheers.

Who'd thunk. I'll put the address number back on this one and the one at Santuario, all I did to test the waters.
Read up in the wiki osm.wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer to understand the thinking.

Hi there,

If you have changes to make in different geographical areas, could you please do this in separate change sets, like here change US and safe, then change in Turkey and safe. Now everyone from the US north west coast to Ankara sees your change at OSM.

Thank you so much and have a nice day.

I've interpreted turn:lanes = right/left/through as tags that go into the lanes segment itself rather that on traffic sign.
And no, relations is still very obscure topic, why I leave shout outs in form of notes on the map the check something, the fix me only popping up if one actually clicks the item.

First I here. There are traffic signs that say straight only, left only, right only, the round blue with arrows. As yet not found a different tag to convey what drivers can do, any driver for any vehicle. Kindly point me to the correct tag(s).

Good morning,

I left a note on the map at Casoli some weeks ago about the broken relation of the SS5 (all road signs and km marks are still ref. to SS5 not SR5 here in Prov. PE), The note pertains to the broken relation of said SS5 between Casoli and Tagliacozzo as can be seen here osm.org/relation/31311. The red route on the map between those two places it missing, not showing, suspecting the name is inconsistent rather than the references.

Have a good day.

traffic_sign2 was a type on my part (actually I don't see the second semicolon, but now that I know it's there I'll type it... normally I pick the tag whence the first few letters narrow down the available tags, but that is massively slow method for me.
Just played around with 3 signs on one point 2 forward, 1 back with your method of annotation and traffic_sign:2:forward does not invoke a drop down list of the most common T.signs i.e. does not seem legal. Suppose this would be legal

traffic_sign:forward = no_entry
traffic_sign:backward = give_way;roundabout

But it does not show the directional cast in my browser, just the small black dot.

If my editor is broken, the standard web browser ID editor, then I suppose I need to bring that issue to the attention of the programmers.

For now, a traffic sign icon that only shows a very small black dot without visual direction cast I consider undesirable and whilst there may be 'common' methods of annotation that have found prevalence, it's not with what I feel comfortable. Since the 1000+ T.Signs I've spread around town have only caused very few fix issues, I'll for now stick with what works and is not broken.

Of course, apologies for the typos... where people cut wood, there's always chips on the floor.

ciao

BTW, did notice one thing, the visual feed back of where the traffic sign is pointed did disappear. Not a fan of that. Like to see where, which is not always right perpendicular on the street i.e. you've not convinced me.

An interesting way of tagging I've not seen before, frist the forward/backward and then = whatever. You've got your job cut out as I've plastered hundreds around Pescara the 'old', T, 1, T2.
That said, who exactly is adding traffic signs around Pescara except me? As yet not anywhere seen them in Pescara and the wider province surroundings but with my ID.
Have a good sunday, I'm going oudoors. Indian summer.