While there fixing the city_limit tag, kindly add city_limit=begin or city_limit=end whatever is applicable. Often they go in pairs either back to back somewhere near across the street, either indicating the community being exited or entered.
FYI.

BTW when I hit Ctrl+F5 I see a carello with the Supermarket name in the render view but no parking tag since it's on top of the parking area i.e. it appears fine, to me.

Actually, it's both. Trouble is the routing keeps popping up with 'above ground but no bridge'. It was on my TD list to resolve, but please go ahead and fix.
ciao

Bus stops have names (that of the street they are on, in pescara including the civic number the are at), it's a specific question in the Streetcomplete app and used as an identifier in a route relation. Please put it back.

Not something, multiple! Think you've got your work cut out as many are more than a few years old. Guidelines are guideline, not musts!, and boy is there physical separation come reaching the toll gates.
4 hours into this discussion, still see only lanes=1 tag but these days OSM is very slow to update as the rendered view shows me the 7 lanes I drew a 4 weeks ago.
Now I'm done with this going nowhere. Make it proper and fix those other motorway exits and entrances. 'how it SHOULD be'
Ciao Ciao

Great, I just put the random examples out to show that this is NOT universally accepted and practice and I go by the examples, not some assertive arguing, but I'll adept. Leaves the lanes count number. If a motorway is 2 lanes 1 direction or 3 or 4, it's tagged with 2-3-4. The exit should be tagged with 7 not 1 as per the second example, and there are multiple random motorway exits toll barriers that show this. Another example at Firenze, 5 gates, tagged 5 lanes on, 9 gates off, 9 lanes tagged. Still see only 1 on Pescara Ovest.
cheers.

Tastes vary on how it 'should' be done. 2 random examples from around Rome
1) All lanes on entrance mapped separately, exit for telepass and ticket mapped separately.
osm.org/edit#map=17/41.93027/12.75695
2) All lanes mapped as 1, but total lanes indicated: 14
osm.org/edit#map=17/41.92603/12.70690
So I beg to differ with you on the matter and expected to at least see lanes=7 and not lanes=1 at the A14 exit Pescara Ovest.
Those with telepass and self navigating car wont know which gate to take either.
Have fun

As per edit comment, was just placeholder, it keeps coming back even if reported as false positive. The pins Osmose often places miles off from the real location, the latest one in the middle of city hall, but actually at lungomare, abandoned as well. One can only shake head and walk away.

Hi fixfighter,

You can't draw 2 roads on top of eachother, here a section of parking_aisle over a section of service road. 1 of the 2 pieces has to go. While there, kindly tag serv.road as covered=no.

Cheers and happy new year.

Note that you are NOT the owner of the data others put in, 'fontanella' is helpful to cyclists who seek a drinkwater spot, of which there are many named this way around Abruzzo. Also, why did you delete the descriptive text on the farmacy. Is it a problem to you?
Don't bother to reply.

Hi damianeue

The residential area as per this change set osm.org/relation/8506233/history#map=18/42.44768/14.22025 indicates an unfinished outer line "Open relation type=multipolygon". I've arbitrary closed the line and extended the residential area up to the where adjacent areas reach. the error seems gone, will know by tomorrow when Osmose gets updated if this fixed the issue. Just in case.

Beyond a doubt it's a short bridge, the width of the road, the breadth of 2 rails wide, 7x8 at best. Bridge areas are drawn to, as said, bind multiple parts on a bridge together, road north, road south, sidewalks, cycle tracks, guard rail, railing, and what not. To quote "and if the lower way is short and the upper way is supported on concrete, brick on metal pillars / beams then that is almost certainly a bridge." It looks like a bridge, it smells like a bridges the composition is a bridge, and 'Underground' is when you look up and cant see the sky because there's a layer of soil/rock in between ;o)

Why start a discussion and agree and finish? The 2 rail bridge pieces are bound together by a bridge area just added. Leads road in cutting Where there is a bridge the is no tunnel tag, the wiki is clear on that and seen hundreds like that. "But both options should not be used at the same time (a bridge tag for the upper way and a tunnel for the lower way for the same crossing).Rail IS on bridge!

Far as street view shows its a cutting the rail passing on a bridge i.e. not a tunnel.

Hi,

TagInfo is easily searchable on what is and what's not favoured. Here all with 'rotor' in it https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=rotor As you see, someone also used diameter:rotor

BTW, I did a few mass corrections on the rotor_diameter key, about 3 times, so think you won't find many, at least presently the use is not listed.

ciao

Hi

Could you please use rotor:diameter instead of rotor_diameter. Tag info leads the way on what is good and what's not. See https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=rotor:diameter

thx

someone from out of town fixed the relation this morning. It's a pity you cant see the towers and roof elements in the standard OSM rendering.

Hi, feel free to correct those. If you want to know if a tag/key is in use, visit https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=minheight
There are not many, but if established keep using it.
ciao

Hi,

You cant use tags like Grotta, Roccia, Sorgente, they have to be the English translation e.g. 'Sorgente' would be 'well', 'Grotta' would be 'cave', all in small, no maiuscolo. Valid keys and tags you can check at https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=well
ciao

Yes, but you cant have building= and building:part= together on a single element which is an issue per Osmose, so something else is wrong in that constellation.