Thanks for your prompt reply.

Would propose tagging with disused:aeroway=runway same as the service road / taxiway.

ciao

Reminder.

This broken outline with just area=yes persists. What was/is the purpose of this unfinished business?
Was it in error and should it be removed?

cheers

Hi

Out of interest while closing some open boundaries in the region, why has this airport runway foot & bicycle=yes on it? The tagging of the runway has been changed many times, even the width changed from 50 to 60 to 50 meters. The http source link is broken so can't really read what's up with this feature with a crossing way.

Just curious me

ciao from italy.

Hi,

What is this *featureless* double line overlaying itself and denoted as object osm.org/way/350991058 generating a change set warning "warnings:suspicious_name:generic_name". There's only a CLC explanation with a wiki link, the same link as the line below as part of the area relations. The line is linked to a farmland relation except there's no farmland, only a landfill on the left and a residential area on the right. Let me know please.

Ciao.

Yes I know, it's next to the steps at the top. Already mapped as a building, unfinished. There are 4 or 5 along the ciclovia towards Porto di Fossacesia what I remember from the last bike trip, all in the same unfinished state, come normale.

BTW why did you change the Buddha statue to fountain? The Fonte Peticcio spring, was already mapped close to the info board I added yesterday at Via Roma and Ciampoli on the other side of Via Adriatica.

Better be sure what you change and add and where.

Hi,

Where in the world did you get the notion of changing these 10 x 50cm step height steps needed to be changed to a public bath? This is duly reverse!

Hi,

What's the function of this broken (import?) line around a section of industrial area?

See osm.org/relation/14099794

You say 'Errata corrige' but the change set indicates with a warning that the line is not closed.

cheers

The correct link to the change is osm.org/changeset/120492867

Repaired turn rule you broke. See osm.org/changeset/120103110

Hi,

sport=motor or motocross?

JIC

Resolved 3 issues created by CS osm.org/changeset/120456901. Bare rock renders again. Queried with mapper as to what the intend was.

Hi,

What was the purpose of that line you traced along the administrative boundary and then gave it a role in the big/long bare rock which resulted in the bare rock no longer rendering?

ciao

Hi StevenBob and Benvenuti, Willkommen, Bienvenue, Welcome to OSM pleasure dome,

For your reading pleasure on how to not find your head on a dining plate when mapping for the common good

osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments
osm.wiki/Changeset

ciao

Just FYI, rough mapping does nothing in rendering terms, not in any of the 8 map render selections in Osmose, best to me carto.fe whose designer does lots of special sports pitch rendering features. Had forgotten I mapped a corner on my home course and then stopped, realising a course usually outside mown fairways is the very stuff we don't like to be in.
Have to revisit as all the tee boxes need retagging here. No ladies/men designation, just 4 coloured levels, back, middle, forward, juniors. (our course has on anything par 4 and 5 four tee boxes.)
Anyway, the scrub is no longer flagged in OSMI changing it to outer but it aint look good.
Vaguely remember having played Noordwijk for a competition + training round, but that was like 23-24 years ago. See lots of 'natural' sand traps to add from above.

Hi,

nothing but foot is from a navigation routing software point of view signified by the fact it is tagged as a footpath, foot=yes an overdo too, but that's what the wizard tags, usually as designated. So happens the DWG confirmed this while discussing a CS where someone did same.

Hi,

square does not need an area tag. Before was not flagged in any QA prog of OSM.

The tagging of both pedestrian area and square on the same object is technically conflicting though.

Hi,

Ik heb wat role correcties op je scrub gemaakt, echter ook zoals het nu is gemapped rendered the scrub door the fairways heen.

Voor de goede orde, mocht die scrub eigenlijk rough zijn, er is de golf=rough tag. Heb nog nooit op een baan gespeelt waar scrub (bosjes areaal) direct aan fairways grenst of erover gaat. Heb vorig jaar een hele golfbaan gedaan en geen rough gemapped omdat het de defenitie van on golfbaan is buiten de fairways, maar ik ga het testen om te zien of dat een bevredigend resultaat oplevert. IIG aan de in OSM gemapte Kennemer heb je een redelijk goed voorbeedl

ciao

PS er zijn nog tenminste 4 pad secties die verbinding behoeven zoals de warnings bij de CS aangeeft.

There's a tag value flood_prone with 23000 uses described as "Whether or not the feature is likely to flood after very heavy rain." Anyway, I've pushed the false positive button to indicate the user wants it so :O)

ciao

Hi,

After correcting 'intermitent' to 'intermittent', your wetland gets flagged that this key cant go together with wetland, not mentioned in the wetland wiki nor on the intermittent wiki. Maybe the land.

Maybe too add wetland=saltmarsh since the water is tagged as salt.

Just so your'e aware

ciao.

No worries. I always check in history view after large area edits if the render stays or the wood like here disappears. Unfortunately ID Editor is not very good at verification of closed rings on large relations as it does not load the full relation into memory if not new, but it does report oftentimes below the CS comment with warning(s) if something is wrong in the geometry.