Are you sure this roundabout is real?

osm.org/way/1097104331

Somehow I remember you removing a roundabout in the very same place last year.

Anyway, QA flags it, a RB should have no name but when unique, needs junction=roundabout and removal of the superfluous oneway tag. All roundabouts on Marconi are of a hybrid hamburger type, the through way only for buses like you can see on the other ones on that street. The city so smartly is now installing bus activated traffic lights because that was is accidents in the waiting. Not seen progress though in a few weeks, but tomorrow I'm cycling south and the go-pro will register, has better memory than me too, solid state as it's called ;o)

ciao

PS There's also a flag of sudden level change from D'Ascanio onto the roundabout but that one does not make sense at all.

Flagged by QA: Consider if you put restrictions on gates access=no, the ways to and after the gate also need to have their access adjusted or you create unroutable states. Not the first time.

E non all'interno dell'isola pedonale!

Strikev Farindola, that's Pescosansonesco Nuovo

OK, in that case the construction=motorway needs to change to construction=amenity, add a note= tag with your description of the planned work (parking lot), and if you have start date and an (magnana magnana) delivery/completion date, fill those out as well. Then the system will ask when it's time if the work is done.

If the work has not started, (start date in future) than actually it's not construction but proposed.

Bus 19 I've fixed with chg of name per convention. Bus Rimini 1 is unclear whether it runs clock or anticlock. The part on the 8-roundabout suggests it's clock wise. The other 2 lines I did not check what wrong with those.

cheers

Ciao,

v.v. l'area di costruzione, strade o inclusivo i terreno nel triangolo?
Penso che sia solo una rotatoria e alcune strade secondo la tua descrizione sull'oggetto dell'area di costruzione.

Ho notato che le linee degli autobus che passano lì sono apparentemente tutte interrotte.

Dalla tua risposta si può dedurre che non stai guardando i dati in tempo reale. Il ponte non è mai partito, è lì da diversi mesi. Di fronte al canale sotterraneo è apparso 2 settimane fa senza una ragione apparente. L'ho rimosso. Il fiume non ha interruzioni. Caso chiuso.

Ponte ancora lì, che ripristina il corretto attraversamento del canale sotterraneo.

La combinazione di

culvert: osm.org/way/839651898
bridge:
osm.org/way/839651898

Molto strano

Hi,

beside the duplicate way of bridge on top of track which I've removed, there's also the culvert tag on the stream which tag was added AFTER the bridge was mapped months before. Which is it?

Ciao,

oltre al percorso duplicato del ponte in cima al sentiero che ho rimosso, c'è anche il tag del canale sotterraneo sul flusso che è stato aggiunto DOPO che il ponte è stato mappato mesi prima. Cos'è questo?

OK, all 3 areas render again, while there added some orchards in the farmland plot.

Was there last night in passing to the airport, pertenently not a roundabout, 2 stop spots, even had attached a wiki link to the way explaining "A road junction where the traffic goes around a non-traversable island but does not always have right of way.
"A road junction where the traffic goes around a non-traversable island but does not always have right of way.". 2 stop spots, no yield/roundabout signs, 2022-09-18

Reverted to old state!

Are you sure about that roundabout tagging? FAICR there's at least 1 spot where traffic on the circle has to give way to traffic coming from the right and yup, that stop spot is still there and still there are no roundabout signs.

Bitte auf English... 5 continents from Scotland to Tasmania spanning edit set.

Ciao,

Sul mio commento alla tua modifica precedente, dopo aver apportato altre correzioni, la relazione con i terreni agricoli è simile a questa

osm.org/relation/1274103

Più righe che (ancora) non hanno alcun senso.

Il Turbo Overpass mostra il prima e il dopo

https://dev.overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=126115689&relations=true

https://dev.overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=126115513&relations=true

Le linee rosse sono quelle che sono state spostate o cancellate.

Le immagini satellitari mostrano che l'area in generale è stata classificata correttamente come terreno agricolo. Le piccole macchie che hai mappato sono contrassegnate come "interne" al grande terreno agricolo, tranne per il fatto che la maggior parte del contorno del terreno agricolo è sparita.

Non fa bene.

Hi,

On my comment to your previous edit, after you making some more corrections, the farmland relation looks like this

osm.org/relation/1274103

Multiple lines that (still) make no sense at all.

Turbo overpass shows the before and after

https://dev.overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=126115689&relations=true

https://dev.overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=126115513&relations=true

The red lines are those that got moved or deleted.

Sat imagery shows the area in general was classed correctly as farmland. The small patches you mapped are tagged as 'inner' to the large farmland, except most of the farmland outline is gone.

Not good.

Hi,

momentarily 2 gaps in your route, north and south of Corropoli.

momentaneamente 2 stacchi nel tuo percorso, nord e sud di Corropoli.

Ciao

Hi,

This is what Turbo Overpass sees:

https://dev.overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=126224431&relations=true

You made changes somewhere in Morocco, Somewhere near the Italian border and somewhere in the Czech republic and the good OSM Lord knows why on earth these separate geographical areas had to be edited and saved in the same change set.

PLEASE DON'T DO THAT. Save them separately. Nobody in that box outside of those 3 small distinct areas has need to get this crowbarred into their local CS history view.

If not already in the know, here's a wiki with CS guidelines available in about 14 translation: osm.wiki/Changeset

MTIA for your consideration on your future mapping endeavours.

Hi

Your corrections have created quite a few broken state issues per the change set summary, to start with the chaos on the farmland relation. Any plans to fix this or should the rescue troops be called in?

Only goes to show that WYSINWYG.

Funny, you remove the full stop on name of one part of the cycleway but you leave it on the section before ;O)