As per the note, osm.org/relation/285964 should be relatively easy to split since large zones have hardly any 'inner' objects such as the NE branch.

Hi,

thanks for replying. I gave it pause absent your reaction. Phase I the major outer an inner outlines is done, members down from 2303 to 1872, now deciding where to place the cuts where convenient. Often major roads are used as natural borders except there's not much here. Also Osmose reports many many inner area overlaps needing cleaning as else JOSM will just bombard with validation warning.

Got the area saved on my drive using JOSM and first thing I do each day is refresh the area to make sure I've got all the changes. Long as you don't do anything that touches on osm.org/relation/155024 after 4:00 PM we should have no conflicts.

I'm working on Gran Sasso park presently homing in on the end stretch. I do inner first by rule and only then do the areas allowing to pre-decide where to lay the splits. Used even long farm tracks to realize this.

TTYL
Rob

The one in San Clemente I updated yesterday, and then Osmose whining this morning it no longer serves GTL diesel has the right lat/lon per the register with matching address of Via San Clemente so the one in Torre de' Passeri on the SP would be logically the one with the wrong MISE. Given that there are 3 fuel stations in Passeri and only 2 in the lastly 7.1.2023 updated register it gives yet another one has surfaced that is not 'registered'. That list is growing.

OK, grazie, sto mappando la copertura del suolo da 2 mesi intorno al Parco Nazz. del Gran Sasso e mi sono imbattuto in queste immagini solo perché creano un'ombra molto lunga nelle immagini satellitari. Ora so cosa potrebbe essere aggiungendo altro paesaggio.

ciao

Ciao Stefano

Guardando i tag delle 2 torri che hai mappato qualche mese fa, puoi confermare che la costruzione 'tiranti' è quella indicata in questo wiki per tower:construction=guyed_lattice ?

osm.wiki/Tag:tower:construction=guyed%20lattice?uselang=en

Sei sicuro che ci sia un misuratore di velocità del vento (anemometro) in cima a queste torri alte 40 metri o è o anche per la ricezione / trasmissione radio o cellulare?

Grazie
Rob

Nome verifica, Contrada Feudo continua dal ponte tra Alento, dove cambia il nome Strada Sant'Ilio. Entra tutte due nel OSM.

ciao.

Better do it in yours so those who see the CS revert don't have to discover the link first and drill in ;O)

thanks.

Hi

It would be good to state WHY this revert!

thanks a bunch

Hi,

Your country covering CS does not make it easy on reviewing what you did but anyway, propose forward on you save your edits per-route, I came across this MTB path Relation History: (SI-C P10-B) Assergi - Castel del Monte (12601445) which JOSM has been reporting since I first touched it as having 3 gaps and sorting did not improve. What I did find is routing from Assergi to Castel del Monte with sections going against oneway directions. That may be fine for MTB riders but then the tagging on those sections need to be told they're oneway:bicycle=no OR the MTB section is parallel mapped to the side of the road if that is what's actually done. Also found a dead end, removed, as it was not specified as first forward and then repeated backward. Cant believe riders taking a coffee break at an agriturismo. The end result is there's 2 flagged gaps left, They're in the route relation, maybe falsely flagged. I know zero about MTB routing so that's where this issue is handed over to you.

Kindly verify
Ciao

You're welcome, but you don't need to go back each time as JOSM has the same Name Suggestion Index for preset tags as ID has. Just add the NSI Tagging preset to JOSM, hit F3 and type the name, Just tried on a blank node and these tags came up for Euronet.

amenity=atm
brand:wikidata=Q5412010
brand=Euronet
operator:wikidata=Q5412010
operator=Euronet

PS. Worked with the JOSM programmer in September as this add on caused major JOSM performance collapse on larger data sets. Eventually he found a very old issue while profiling that had caused multiple performance issues and unresolvable bug tickets... now it flies to include tracing and then he found more related bad code which should speed JOSM startup. Not yet in a JOSM stable release yet.

ciao

access=no + emergency=yes I believe the combo was. Can't remember if an highway=emergency_bay node was also place on the road too. If signed with blue IT:II.328 Piazzola su viabilità ordinaria then strictly by traffic law these are not access restricted.

Hi,

I'm working on simplifying this massive forest relation. It was 2303 members few days ago, now down too 1944 with the aim to splitting the forest into smaller sections, the recommended size not to exceed 300 members but if I can split it down to 4-5 it would already be major and make future editing much less bad, the relation already at version 547. Problem is when trying to upload and mapping you touching and changing parts of the same there's conflicts. Fixable but that takes quite a bit of time each run so I'll ask you to not do anything that affects this Relation: 155024, say not after 16:00 PM (the late afternoon) Step is cleaning up all the outline bits which is extremely fragmented and correct areas where the wood overlaps areas that are actually not inside. Adding that area relations are not to cross major roads i.e. they need splitting there too. Not done overnight.

Thanks
Rob

NB: Unfortunetly according this Osmose map filter there are dozens upon dozens of the double polygons, one line use to tag the inner area, the second - tagless line- given the inner role of the monstrous sized forest relation, version 535 now. See link, zooom to area
https://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/en/map/#item=1170&zoom=10&lat=46.0417&lon=10.8009

Anyone seeing this, this Forest relation is a mess, a mess at 2300 members with inconsistent polygon mapping techniques used. Needs urgent splitting.

hi,

All your change sets always just say you're adding buildings so I look sometimes since you do everything under that CS comment label and saw you added wikidata/pedia tags of the route relation to Corso Umberto Primo in Montesilvano Just not a good idea since that route is over 2200 members meaning you'd be repeating same same for every road section in that route. Hope you had no plans doing that. Please let's abolish that idea and only tag the minimal which is the ref=SS16 here which kicks in as map name if no name=* has been entered,

Cheers

Oh, and the second Via Marche mapped in 2013 is Via Puglia :O)

Hi,

For good order, the roles for the ski area segments has to be 'outer', not 'inner' . Notably you tagged both the subareas and the MP relation with the same tags. Within a multipolygon the feature tags only go on the multipolygon relation. Best is you move the names to single nodes centered within the individual areas. That might facilitate the for the names to show on the map.

ciao

1 year later .... possible some silly reflex to an Osmose moan. There's lots of infissi here who construct windows (and doors) su misura. I'm fine with windows put back to what I put there originally.

Hi,

Look like another poorly developed/instructed set up of a maproulette chalenge
When you convert parking nodes to parking areas you also have to verify the parking 'area' can be reached by routing either by mapping a way onto the parking from the road or tagging it as parking=street_side when it is directly at the side of the street without separation. I have fixed it, but please tell the one who set up this project.

ciao

Ciao,

Per il vostro piacere di lettura e per l'applicazione ai vostri change sets in futuri. osm.wiki/IT:Good_changeset_comments

Nessun commento è inutile.

Grazie