OK, duplicate way removed, inner's gone, converted to a simple polygon outline. As bonus mapped a few orchards and track.

BTW, it was not only a duplicate way, it was connected at every of the 1236 nodes to the one which was there before, both with same MP tags. Anyway, the name does/did not render at any zoom level but I've seen that before on protected areas/natural reserves. Wonder how official the very long name is.

Hi,

Why is this natural area in a type=multipolygon relation and not type=boundary? What is the relation of these 25 'inner' to the protected area? These residential and other areas with buildings like Ospidale Fraticini now show a protected area boundary inner, this set up not seen anywhere before. Think they all need to be removed from the protected area relation as the are not 'inner' to anything and in fact are flagged that their roles have to be outer, if at all. In fact now the boundary has been mapped twice, object 1160009968 and 1228938891. One has to go as now it's reported as a duplicated segment of 1236 nodes.

please let us know
ciao

Hi The 'saga'... saw one of the changes applied to sections of the SS16 to secondary following the close of the Trombetta. Me thinketh the roundabout from SS714 to SS16 and part De Lollis have to be Primary now, their practical role now.

have a nice day.

Hi

You 'typo' got flagged. It's Publio, not Publbio. If you change a street name, you need to change all sections including the Vico's too and the addresses referring to the street name. See wiki https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Publio_Ovidio_Nasone

ciao

Hi,

Don't want to know why you changed this beach resort building to hotel... some hotels operate a beach spot, but it does not make the location a hotel. Changed it to retail... nobody sleeps there... does eat there, drinks there', sits in the sun.

ciao

And no one who's done the hot potato of the half dozen flixbus routes, still looping around the ol trombetta. I'd leave that to Armondo, whence he finds out.

BTW, there's 4 editors mapping in that SS16-SS714 roundabout zone last 3 days....

No need, except for Luciani I'd connect directly to the flare top to resolve the level change issue and simplify routing steps. How a bus driver coming off the attrezzato is going to make that turn to the right lord knows, probably a full loop and then a turn onto Carmelo and thru onto Luciani is advised but see no such sign as e.g. at Ortona station exit.

There's one yield/roundabout traffic sign that needs to go absent the direct connect

ciao

BTW, the cops actually blocked the Carmelo exit on Saturday thusly all could not be traced then.

Hi,

Do not follow why you changed the geometry of Luciano. I've cycled it a few times and the traces and the experience is it direct connects to the roundabout, not that change twisr unless they added that overnight on Sunday, while the police was monitoring traffic flow
on Saturday when the junction opened.

At any rate QA now flags this as inconsistent level connections.

Hi,

ID got it wrong on crossings... crossing=* is to say what the type is, traffic_signal, uncontrolled, unmarked etc. Someone even inserted a line "crossing=marked (used by iD preset) - with crosswalk, with or without traffic lights", but that does not legitimize it... anyone can edit the wikis.
The crossing:marking is not =yes, it's meant to say e.g. zebra. It's like the many barrier=yes, which is meaningless.... barrier=gate/block/fence tells what they are. The root wiki actually says "crossing:markings=* - to tag the existence and style of pedestrian crossing markings"... zebra, rainbow, there's a whole bunch of esoteric styles, allowing to also add the colours of the markings.
In short now we have a bunch more BeeEs tagging combos from the ID automaton.... crossing=marked + crossing:markings=yes, doesn't look good, neither adding another version to the object history for nop.
One of the many reasons I very rarely use ID to include it's poor poor handling of relations in any form, but that's a debate of it's own and endless.

ciao ciao

Errata... actually the deletions were in this CS osm.org/changeset/153109443 "rimosso terreno agricolo ". No alerts remain in the area by OSMI momentarily. My cleaning of the MP was here osm.org/changeset/155961383#map=19/45.865182/10.939339

Hi

I've deleted the 2 member farmland relation on areas with buildings since the surrounding farmland parts were deleted. (Most looks more like vineyards, but that's all I can judge from above. Best practise is you map the individual plots which makes all these complex multipolygons superfluous anyway.

happy mapping.

Ciao,

Credo che dopo 7755 set di modifica si conoscano i problemi segnalati sopra... close vertices, highway crossing building, highway/highway crossing. Questi avvisi vengono visualizzati prima della chiusura del set di modifica. Ne ho corretti alcuni. Per favore, controllate i problemi rimanenti.
mille grazie a tutti

👍👍👍

The groynes not affixed to land being part of the relation looks odd, I wouldn't.
In a few hours OSMI should be updating. It's strange for this issue showing up 8 days after the last mod on the rel also highlighting the relations for the sub areas in the south and see now sow blue lines and duplicate ways being flagged
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=15.83321&lat=39.78057&zoom=12&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&opacity=0.50&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cwayshttps://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=15.83321&lat=39.78057&zoom=12&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&opacity=0.50&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways incl a isle offshore.

TTYL

Seems you have broken something as now the country outline lights up in OSM Inspector. https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=13.51358&lat=43.69502&zoom=9&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&opacity=0.50&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

Please check

Salve,

Hi,

I fontanella e dentro o fuori i edifice? I posizione e dentro momentanemento

ciao

cioa

caio

Misplaced and duly removed.

Ciao,

sei sicuro di aver aggiunto il tag landuse=grass in quanto ora il cimitero sembra un prato. Penso che il cimitero originale:sector sia sufficiente + ref, immagino che tu abbia cambiato il tag per motivi di rendering.
ciao

Hi,

Change set from France to Greece all these far apart viewpoints in one change set, which is bad, change sets should be done by country at most, see best practice wiki, and you saw them all, did you? No mention how you acquired the information which the reviewers sure would like to know. Survey, travel catalog, google maps?
None of them have the tags for viewing directions, none a name, quite a few here have, to tell visitors what they're looking at.

Please let us know.