errata: The video is attached to this object osm.org/way/1311955083#map=18/42.316141/13.310682

Hi,

Apologies. The longer viaduct in the motorway section, Fornaca west, was blown up in 2022 for a new one, seismic proof, video in my edit. Nobody bothered to adapt the road routing and accesses till now, so I did. By the looks it will be still a while, the Fornaca east now oneway=no . It's not an extremely busy motorway so the usual, taking their time. Forgot about FB routes.

Mea Maxima Culpa
cheers

Hi,

Is there now somewhere a place holder node to carry all these area tags... my overpass can't seems to find any, and Adriatic I've never heard of being a contentious name.

chrs

Since I still had the data set from last week, just refreshed that coastline section, then seeing there were border imports along that coastline breaking at least 5 area relation, done by the CS prior to Filo's doing by this account osm.org/user/Import%20DGU%20borders, few hundred edit, guaranteed success. This is 1 mapper scale above me.

Hi,

Actually think that Filo edit should have been reverted as the Adriatic coastline boundary is broken in the Volosko corner in multiple sections, since highlighted in OSM Inspector. Not a week ago I spent hours loading the Adriatic relations to correct it, most time wasted on loading the whole A relation into JOSM memory to verify all was properly closed. Oh will, version 1011 now, mopping with the watertap open.

ciao

Ciao, ho corretto la relazione del Castello in modo che tutto appaia correttamente, tranne per il fatto che c'era un conflitto di etichette del sidewalk sull'edificio del castello che ho dovuto rimuovere. Sospetto che il sidewalk o il camminamento dovessero seguire lungo la parte superiore delle mura del castello. Sicuramente deve essere disegnato separatamente. Così sai, come ultimo editore della relazione del castello. Le modifiche che puoi trovare in questo CS:

osm.org/changeset/161670716

saluti

Is the crossing here on a traffic_calming=table ???

Hi,

Don't know why you keep adding nodes to circles, buildings, watertowers, roundabouts, wastewater clarifiers and the like over and above what the editors auto-calculate depending on the size of the ring as good enough to get a fluid round ring in map rendering, but it's being noticed. Adds zero value to the map.

cheers

PS There's the record keeper who put 400 on a larger roundabout... I apply reversal or simplify, only when I stumble on them ,O)

Hi,

You're the third person to revert cycleways/roads this same mapper has imported from GPX top of existing ways. Wrote him a note, got a reply back seemingly not understanding. This looks an awful lot like he did the same tracks again.

cheers

ciao,

alcune correzioni della tua modifica

osm.org/changeset/161978347#map=19/42.600515/14.072403

felice mappatura

Updt. Every cm is still there, now a segregated cycleway witb a 90 degrees connsction. The geometry ill work over

BTW, one ethos in OSM is preserving chronology, turn restrictions can be edited, you don't delete and create new ones. Here the razed:highway lifecycle tag would have applied. This signals to the next mapper something changed. I fall foul of this rule myself, still, but since someone deleted new buildings and mapped the demolished ones back I keep old buildings and add more tags to signal it was and nolonger is.

Your CS comments are not very informational, and when there are more mappers in the same area it's all the more important. Reminds me of that roundabout you deleted then remapped on Marconi when it was gone. That's a true candidate for such tagging excluding it from routers but retaining it for mappers. It would have prevented this duh. I'll check the geometry in while. It continues to be a dangerous junction for cyclists, so i actually leave the track and go on the road there for more visibility both ways regardless of the sign for obligatory use. Seen a scooter there hit by car.... scooter drivers behavior not exactly secure many a time so who was to blame I cant say.

BTW the disused Sangritaria passing Casoli... long overdue to get the abandoned tag prefix. In parts the rail is really gone. 57 level crossings needing updating since the installations are disabled.

Corrections. osm.org/changeset/161851649

The building in question is identical in size in Bing & Mapbox, latter though suffering from heavy fog world wide. As for mapping areas, I refer you to the Wiki that explains how to map an area with an inner space, where the building is. In ALL imagery there's a fringe around the building. If there is not in real life then the cutout is not even needed, just plump the building on. Since there's no discernable way to the building that would be OK

(In sources we may not us for mapping the building is also still the same fully enveloped by grass, looking like a utlility service building)

Obviously if the Mapbox imagery is newer v.v. particulars of new/replaced buildings and new/changed roads you make the best of it,

For aligning the imagery in ID Editor, here a video of several found on youtube explaining this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8s-pN6gpY7w

Otherwise happy mapping and stay cool.

You mean to say that roundabout bypass is nolonger there? It's not what my memory says of last weeks crossing onto Pindaro, could have been on autopilot. I'll include it in todays giro and fix it next.

In seguito al mio precedente commento, ho informato la Comunità Italiana di questo fatto e sono stato informato che altri “elementi validi” sono stati cancellati da voi. Per favore, visitate e spiegate lì.

https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/un-gran-numero-di-cancellazioni-di-modo-sconcertante/124880

Salve,

Sono piuttosto perplesso riguardo al tuo set di modifiche, in particolare le cancellazioni come i vari vialetti che sono reali quando si guardano le immagini aeree
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=161091954

(Si noti che questo set di modifiche si distingue perché ha lasciato una relazione di area negativa).

Per favore, fateci sapere al più presto

Hi,

Good for you living there on Ischia, BUT, with your 3rd edit now the Southern Italy boundary is being highlight as a black boundary on the OSMI areas view indicating that now there's something wrong!

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=16.39820&lat=40.80409&zoom=8&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&opacity=0.50&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

This shows you're the last one:
osm.org/relation/17514288

Please fix (think the 2 little island you added need to have as coastline added and to be inserted into the SI relation as well else they remain under water. A sample you'll find near to the left close to the breakwater osm.org/way/288290270

If you break a sweat and need help, we're here.

(Big OSM brother is watching you ;o))))

Thanks

PS locale=ru? You gave more information than you may have wanted too.

Ciao Alluminio0173

No, i 6 duplicati li ho lasciati stare perché non ho accesso “on-the-ground” per verificare quale numero è corretto e quale è il duplicato.
JOSM avverte quando ci sono due numeri uguali nella stessa strada. Ha anche un plugin per cambiare automaticamente l'addr:street quando il nome della via viene cambiato/corretto.

Salute

PS Il protocollo per i numeri civici quando hanno un suffisso alfa è sempre scritto in minuscolo, ad esempio 53a. Quando hanno un suffisso numerico, ad esempio /1, rimane così. L'Istat sembra dettare i formati dei numeri civici dove ufficialmente /1 /2 ecc. non è consentito, ma è comunque la realtà che anche il portalettere utilizza.

Hi,

Don't know why you removed the tratto primo / secondo from the Via Enrico Jasonni names here, "fixed shops, streets" as CS header explains absolutely zilch, but now all addresses, like 10 are flagged as incorrect. Kindly fix.
(If at all, those names with tratto could have been placed in alt_name so they remain searchable in OSM). Certainly the number of calls I've had by couriers and others that they can't find our housenumber are countless. It's because it's on a disconnected part from the original which used to be one).

cheers