Yes we know it is ;O). It is in the planning to update the whole relation to include making it rendering properly in 3D. The multipolygon is entirely wrong for this complex structure.

cheers

The roundabouts are being messed with on Marconi... they have laid asphalt straight across and at the same they have installed many refuge islands to stop the Jackie Icks that roam the town. Who knows will they be painting cycle tracks and ASL's like on D'Annunzio next months. ;O)
Happy mapping, in isolation.
(To be continued.)

Please do your edit comments in English or the language of the country where you're editing, We dont speak krakowiak here.

thank you.

OK

So you need to draw a line around the whole thing. With that line selected go directly to relation and select new relation. type=building and give it the role=outer or outline (I've used outer only so far). Then you attach the 2 parts and tag them both with the role 'part', so that you end up with a relation that is 3 parts, 1 outer, 2 parts. (Not seen any sample where building:part was entered in the role field)
I don't use the building:part=* , just building=* as building:part wont render in OSM 2D standard.
The base wiki is osm.wiki/Relation:building
If stuck, let me know. In the meantime I've done the adjacent building with parking deck which is an identical arrangement, called the relation Sabini 70-80 (when there are many in the area it's easy to identify who's who). Then you can flip flop between the 2.
ciao e bonne chance

Hi, several QA warnings near Ripa: suspicious tag combination power=plant together with generator:source

You specified twice the source is solar, plant and generator.

Was about to get in the car and drive 600 km south as it started to feel as forgotten. Anyway the Castri part in the name was correct... 25% score. :o)
Thanks for fixing.

Seke Rob

Hi Finixfighter.

May I do a suggestion ;? Don't merge building parts that have different levels into a multipolygon. You get building:levels 1;2 or 2:4 or whatever combo and the tags from the individual parts are lost and 3D drawing programs wont know who's who and QA throws this out with "{0.key}} should have numbers only with optional .5 increments
" i.e. the building :levels can have only 1 value.

There's 2 approaches, draw as in past and create a relation type=building then add the parts to that relation, or, if you have different heights and levels on 1 building, draw the lowest levels for the whole building, then put the highest part on top and tag that with layer=1. If bottom is 6 meter high and top is 9 meters high tag the highest part with minheight=6, height=9. If you like use the relation type=building and tag the building parts to that relation. 2D fine, 3D fine. Make sure all nodes turn grey for the top section, same as with side by side. Boths ways the individual building parts retain their tag details and can be easily augmented in more tags, colour, material etc..

If you want to see an example, just did Beate Vergine behind Piazza Duca, then added the parrocchia in a separate multipart drawing and relation as well.

Don't hesitate to ask if you get stuck.

happy mapping.
ciao

You've been keeping the OSM world in suspense for days now, or should we say hostage... décevant.

Pretty pretty please, save 1 country at a time.

There I see on TI service:bicycle:sales with > 500 uses https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=service:bicycle:sales and my issue reports never flagging this as deprecated. With now 6 months, then 2 months actual experience on OSM the 'fix' without telling what was 'fixed' is really popular around here.
For mobile phone numbers there is a phone:mobile or contact:mobile tag, I prefer former. Not seen 2 numbers being squeezed into a single field.
BTW that unrelated bike rental shop still has no name after your intervention.
cheers

Hi, Can't you do your 'mineure' changes on a country by country bases, save them and move on to the next? This way there's only a very smal area where your edits show up. Now I see a block from Paris to some island in the pacific.
Thx fort your consideration.

Per wiki: If there's a conflict, the name on the street signs prevai!. The streets have been numbered on the signs. Only cycled thru partially but I'm sure the rest have numbers on the signs too.

Hey, please stop advertising your changes globally, do it by country or state or province. You make it impossible to see my own and everyone elses change sets the rate you're going.

thanks.

Hey Hendrikklaas (very Dutch name), don't know who came first, but why are there now 2 practically overlapping trails here which had many unconnected crossings to include with streams sending QA in a frenzy? Please review and decide which is to stay and which to go.
thx.

Well, of course complaining works, just now everything from the past 2 days showed up to include the last mapped piece, a driveway in a cutting, but only in 30m resolution. 20, 50, 100 nothing it's all absent.
Oh well.

Oh and WT Heck is up with tthe map render updating. Still cant see stuff from days ago or just 1 square on, one square off like new roads and streets.... invisible unless switching to edit and Openstreetmap Standard which shows that was 'acknowledged' slightly darker than the new stuff.

BTW, binary moment, 0 is black, 1 is white, so I wrote the word instead.and fixed a duplicate node on the go ;P)

None, thinking the cursor was in the building levels field. I'll correct in a little.

Question: Which report did you see this? I try to fix everything new issue right after the Neis report comes updates around 11:30 CET.

thx

PS area:highway has 155000 uses
https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/area:highway , a great place to see if something is courant and how often used, also a good place to search for alternate tagging.

🖖

I've reverted to your old coding minus the typo for your rendering. :O). FYI, if you create an area, highway or foot, and paths run across ID editor would alert you asking to connect the area and the pathways, if it doesn't you know before saving that something is amiss. It did now. Many things don't actually render in standard history view, but if you switch into editor mode and then choose Openstreetmap (standard) background you see it showing.

PS There's a daily 'typo' report and you can see your own daily coding problems at https://hdyc.neis-one.org/?philippec . Click on the QA levels links to see the details. I try to fix mine daily, reports refresh around 11:30 AM

Happy mapping 'daar in België'

Seeing is believing: "Da lì partiranno i lavori per i primi 180 metri: la carreggiata sarà larga 30 metri con una corsia ciclabile lato monte... di cui 2 da utilizzare per gli espropri ".
I am here grasshopper, added a source link to an article and a commencement date 'early 2021'.