Just wondering, why not move the numbers which were on the name field onto the ref field, which the wiki does ref-erence? The sample of ref=111 denotes you can have 111A, B, C etc.

OK, so from the municipio location at that spot we can derive the street/square in front is named Piazza Umberto I. One more blank filled ;O

PS I've removed the name from the residential area as else the chance exists the name would render twice on the map. Not good. why the name appeared in the different spot before is unclear but you got the node back in the exact spot where it was before. All is zen again.

Ah yes, was just reading about that in the wiki and wanting to reverse my overhasty action Curiously the node is now in a different place than it was before. Where is this 'admin_centre' location recorded?

What's puzzling is touching an interpolated address line, and now one appearing diagonally [no history] across a build up area. Always thought these lines go along a street/road edge. Have never mapped any other way either.

Hi

re osm.org/way/943322478

no building levels=0, but roof levels=2 ??

The second building

osm.org/way/943322478

building levels =0, roof levels = 3 ??

Can't possibly be right

Better this way... Both change set boxes are identical and both will disappear almost same time. Now everyone who saw it and sees it not getting it knows playground stuff is not accepted and gets vertical archive treatment, swiftly.

In fact, all 17 ways are triangles, 8 in Seattle and 8 more in the ME plus each a single line and no tags. AFAIC strong candidate for deletion/reversal.

Hi,

No idea what or why Seattle and the ME in \1 change set, the very first test on 6 ways, identical location, top of each other osm.org/way/972003530 just is a drawn triangle line without any tags at all. Can you explain please.

TIA

hi,

If you're interested in knowing about and fixing issues --you're associated with--, 237 change sets you created and 707 related problems at the moment, you may want to look at this report: https://hdyc.neis-one.org/?gianluca%20nigozza .

If another mapper makes changes causing a problem on items I touched before I get them also listed on my report, which is why I got on this broken continuity case. I try to clear them all daily, with a few I leave by exception.

All problems have an answer, easily researched in the OSM database as how to tag them correctly or help you in the right direction.

cheers

Integration dati includere i verificazione gli altre tags sul POI ;)

"Missing international prefix"

ciao

Hi there.

Plz see all the warnings your change set created by dragging highway nodes around while adding/placing fire hydrants. "warnings:crossing_ways:highway-highway" 9x. If you get stuck, use the reverse button right top and do it again. No good saving work when you know it caused issues causing others having the fix the problems.

NB: You'll have to check if the hydrant I dislodged are in the right place.

cheers

It could be me but if these bound boxes had some logic to draw the smallest possible one we would not see half of them. US/Canada to SE Asia is a popular combination, lord knows why. The much smaller box would have been Japan to US, more than half would have been on the Pacific at that.

One last time, please be aware you broke a lot of route continuities around town with your 'come la wiki' so I went ahead and fixed the whole shabang. How did you decide e.g. that the tunnel from Ferrari to the east side of the station is residential, how did the east side street become residential? Next time, discuss first before doing things like this on a town wide scale.
thx

Hi again

Following your other CS 'Cambio highway come', notably, the SS16 which moves thru town connecting Silvi, Sant'Angelo, Montesilvana, Pescara, Francavilla is all SS16 therefore it should be restored to the primary tag.

From the English wiki

Italy: osm.wiki/Tag:highway=primary

Notably, the SS16 which moves thru town connecting Silvi, Sant'Angelo, Montesilvana, Pescara, Francavilla is all SS16 therefore it should be restored to the primary tag.

BTW, there are 9 warnings on this change set. Did you hit ignore 9 times? If so, not good.

Hi

Are you sure you know what you're doing? E.g. a street at the station where no one lives is tertiary, then you change it to residential and you change it back to tertiary and that was only randomly looking at 1 change Should we be reviewing this whole change set?

Someone who closes a change set with just a single full stop in the comment field. How can that be right?

... and exit with resolving the warning that would have appeared in ID Editor to do something about. "warnings:crossing_ways:building-building" which is self explainatory... one of the buildings was mapped whole or part top of a road.

Plz fix. NB: If you had responded to the warning before saving, the editor would have jumped you straight back to the problem point, now I wish you good luck finding the one of the 144 buildings you added in this 1/4 of the globe spanning CS. The warning does suggest a 'ignore issue' was selected, at least, for me that's the only way to get past the problem point and I absolutely hate to do so.

And then save when there's an error warning to include. "warnings:disconnected_way:highway". Please fix!