@ iWowik: If you map across German borders it would be nice if you did you CS commentary in English, Verstehen Sie? Like this guy who maps in Italia only and does some of his comments in German, but never in Italian. Is close to an insult. Your consideration is much appreciated.

ciao

SSW it was.

Thx for filling in. Strange how there's zero reception in the PL fork area when a Vodafone tower is just a stone's throw away. Anyway, can use the risto Wifi when lunching there.

ciao

Hi,

As you are into transmission towers, near Passo Lanciano I left a open space in the woods with a building, suspecting there's mast(s) there. The proprietor of La Sciatore was unaware, just knew Vodafone has no reception at all there at that fork. Link to object osm.org/way/977370647
Just curious.

ciao

Hi again,

please see CS osm.org/changeset/114636667 and note other review comments made on other change sets of yours. It's not a Bundesliga competition. What you add is permanent, unless someone else reviews and corrects, which is not to say everything will be corrected. Map with accuracy, don't leave wide gaps, as close to tracks and roads as possible, NOT on roads.

I've sent you a PM to be sure you receive this as some claim to not get OSM advises of Change Set comments.

cheers

Included adding an abandoned building.

Hi

Took Osmose only 2 hours to question if this is a male, female or unisex hairdresser.
"suspicious tag combination
female=yes together with male=yes
node 7991098259
unisex = yes ?
female=yes
male=yes

Suspect unisex
ciao

Hi,

Msg from Italy which I'm borrowing from another mapper who's much more eloquent than I am.

"Smaller changeset areas, please: osm.wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Hint: north-west corner of your bounding box."

It escapes me why a Canadian park edit and something in/near China have to be in the same change set causing everyone to see this edit in the local CS history view, near top, for days on end if they don't select a specific one. I'm told JOSM is very good at splitting edited parts in one session. Not to see them has been long on the wish list but seemingly an Everest climb worth of difficulty to resolve for regular base line users like me (and they are most all).

MTIA for your consideration.

Hi,

Your change set generated several issues in the QA reporting.

1)Duplicate edge: Don't draw line or road along an area. Separated.
2)You mapped a one way street without a vehicle exit. Added
3)Living street tagging simplified per sign, 'access=residents' (eccetto rewsidenti)
4)Second 1 way cant be 1 way as that causes a no way out for cars. There's a planter(added), so made it a bidirectional alley.
5), you really need to start making building square when they are. Select building outline, right click with mouse and menu shows a box or slect line and hit the Shift+Q key. Hit that to make angles 90 degrees. Works on anything, including parking.
6) added stop signs and building at parking-.
7) A Parking that is not connected to a service rd or parking aisle requires the parking=street_side tag.

Thanks for extending the Arielli stream. The origins have been a riddle for longer.

Happy mapping and you have questions how or why, please do ask.

CS osm.org/changeset/114358341

Victoire, renders.

Yup, it renders now... dry or MP was the issue.

ciao ciao

I've resolved the multipolygon issue for you as per my previous post. If you now look at the MP relation there are 2 coastline parts.
Rendering... Visited some other 'rock' and they've been mapped e.g. as place=islet and render, but in carto there's rendering priority so it's possible that a rock in the sea just shows underwater. In that more tagging is available at osm.wiki/Tag:seamark:type=rock seamark:rock:water_level=dry.
The key has 32K uses. Added that just to see what happens. Tomorrow morning, CET, Osmose would send me a list of new problem issue that have my doings associated with it (I clear my list daily).

ciao

The 'fix' is 'simply' too easy, fools the system into accepting the MP by making it think it's the real deal. It requires the selection of any single polygon node and applying the scissor icon to it e voilà, you've got an MP.

:o)))

Don't quite understand why the Park multipolygon is referring to itself in the member list.... usually that throws an error in Osmose. TBD.

Reality is, I did not know what was changed and standard I then choose to keep the edit that was done by the prior mapper. Only when I revisited to do what I said I'd do did I learn that me keeping your edit resulted in some dozen sections of my edit loosing the MP link to the park relation.

As for the underscores in the wiki links I'm very aware, but as it stood, when visiting the link after saving it against wikipedia:it it proofed working perfectly fine. Makes me think the convention applies to wikipedia= only but then there are an immense mound of taggings with educated guessing required in the OSM system.

The wikidata tag did not need updating as that page does have multilingual references, pity though that they author did not insert the hyperlinks in the page. https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q1085735

My proficiency in that system is very limited, more chance to break it than make it.

Anyway, communicating up front is I think immensely better, makes friends not fiends.

ciao

Updated waste water plant with building and basins, a new type of construct not seen before in the dozens mapped, an inner and outer basin loop. Add fencing.

I had not expected any other reply. Since the system carries dozens of the 'incorrectly' formatted with those underscores, left unactioned, the mentioned 80 or so just in Italy, that's what monkeys do, they copy and then decided to wait on Osmose to flag me tomorrow with any issue on that item, but you did not give it a hope in heck. Rather than just deleting and in the meantime while i was active in that zone and continuously touching on the park outline it caused a conflict alert during saving. Not good. Don't understand any mapper jumping in, It would have been much more appreciated if you just had dropped me a note on my change set, no conflicts, no irritations.

As an OT, here's your Neis stats page: https://hdyc.neis-one.org/?user_5359 ... An interesting read.

cheers.

Hi,

You mapped many power windmills where I live some 5 months ago. Many have the description 'dismantled' but to OSM and Osmose that's meaningless. If physically removed they need to be deleted or tagged in such a way they cause no errors. Some spots have 2 WMs. Unlikely. Anyway, if they are dismantled but to stay than the tag disused or abandoned=yes needs adding. Right now the system demands power=generator be added on some 50 of those. Does not look good.

cheers

Hi,

The whole mapping world had your changeset delivered in the local CS history view, and the mapping world gets dozens delivered in that view of zero interest to the local mapper. No telling though as the comment just says it coastline fixing. I looked at Nun-Rock, it's now in a 1 member MULTIpolygon. That's incorrect AFAIK.

cheers.

Hi,

I added the Italian wiki link, after-all we're in Italy, or are we? The english wiki has no link through to the Italian which is why the addition. wikipedia:it is a legal code, at least some 80 uses per taginfo. Lest you have a solution, I'll change the main link to the Italian if you don't mind.

ciao