Hi,

1) As an experienced mapper you should know that 'no comment' is still no good. Please describe what you do (Think you've been asked several times before)

2) I think for parking objects as areas(lots) and lot POI the new scheme of parking parallel/perpendicular/diagonal is tagged as just orientation=*. The parking:side:orientation is the tag to put of ways. Osmose shows with correction pins the next day.
https://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/en/map/#zoom=18&lat=45.740055&lon=11.729723&level=1,2,3&tags=&fixable=&username=mircozorzo&country=&item=xxxx

With JOSM this one times a few hundred should be very easy to fix.

ciao

Hi,

One of your 'minor changes' broke the Sanctuaire Pelagos in this sector, a 2227 member relation. Please do not ignore the pre-upload validator warning of something being incomplete. Integrity cannot be verified. without a full load of a relation.

Anyway, in 2 step, loading took over 1 hour, sorted the members in a second CS as that too was out of whack.

Thank you for reading.

Also removed area tag on breakwater as JOSM advised.

There's a validation conflict here: The wiki says roundabouts should be given the rating of the highest level way connecting to the roundabout and Osmose complained. JOSM Opposed wants it to remain unclassified, seemingly interpreting that roundabout is part of the Via Gabrielli.

1 wood from 376 to 159 members, same area and nothing broken, thank you JOSM.

Percorso mappato su percorso lo stesso giorno? Perché? Ho rimosso 1 nel set di modifiche

osm.org/changeset/133371441

Buona mappatura

Missed comment: Reduce forest MP by 45 or so inner/outer members sections (combine outlines), map buildings, ways, farming, refine area geometries on ESRI imagery..

Hi

A node drag of the running track onto the main road hundreds of meters away is not improvement, so a revert will be applied.

Ciao

attualmente

parking:both= street_side o lane o half_on_kerb et cet et cet.
+
parking:both:orientation=parallel

detail nel wiki 🖖

Ciao,

anche il tag è necessario city_limit=begin o end?

esempi
begin: osm.org/node/1854667536 e
end: osm.org/node/10675941357

qualche volte uno doppio nomi: city_limit=being;end e direction=20;200
osm.org/node/8379226901

faccia a faccia

buona mappatura

Hi,

Can this broken and seemingly obsolete forest relation be deleted

osm.org/relation/2165957

With JOSM that should be rather quick to do

Ciao

If not already seen, have a look north Milano surroundings, 108 hits traffic_sign=IT:Senso vietato up to some 9 years back, seemingly 1 mapper.

State of breaks

1) Farmland losing many members (50) of multipolygon outline.
2) Meadow same
3) Residential area same
4) Scrub relation dropping from 7 to just 1 member in MP
5) Having corrected and added missing tags on 9 bus routes! A 10th not fixed as it is just 2 street long with a gap in the middle.

Hi IlBano,

Sadly, back to the original, no consensus, of what the Via Tiburtina Valeria / SS5 is on OSM and what continues to be absent as a historical route relation on the OSM system for the full stretch of 214km as pictured in the same wiki

https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/it:Strada%20statale%205%20Via%20Tiburtina%20Valeria?uselang=en#/media/File:Strada_statale_5.png

and this which happily continues to reference the SR5 exSS5, the ref=SR5 which sticks out including smack in the middle of > 10000 inhabitants areas.

https://percorsostrada.it/strada-regionale/sr5-exss5/

I'll sleeps on this a bit more.

cheers

Becaaause that's where my GPS said they were when taking a picture and annotating the bus stop number, like here 445 (sticker on pole ;o)

Hasta la vista

Hi,

Finally, a multi year annoyance, someone deciding that some admin ruling of an SR5 designation superceded ther signs at the side of the road, and new ones still being placed anno 2022.

What I'm a bit confused about is that Via Tiburtina Valeria is signed all the way till the rail underpass at Largo Eugenio Sirolli in Pescara, Wiki says so too in words, but the route relation ends at Chieti Scalo at this time. Am I missing something, more work in the pipeline on this?
👍👍👍👍

PS, the map note from circa 2020 can now be closed, for now.

AFAIR Most all the signs I ever did have a description in words, Italian (English) when using the IT:abc codes, not only IT:C2. Truly beyond someone doing that without consultation.

TGIF though

"dopo cambio codici sulla wiki".

As they say in English "YCMTSU"

Seeing that change I remembered to have tagged IT:C2 hundreds of times, even ID Editor adopted the descriptive tag at one point so often it was used.

Anyway, the one you put your fixme on is Senso Vietato too, both sides of the oneway street end.

ciao

PS There's a plugin which actually has numeric coding for Italy to include one for "No Exit" which continues to be missing in the Italian wiki you 'corrected'. JOSM has one I attached w/ presets for 5 countries, the German part by far the most expansive. (Deutsche Gründlichkeit ;P). Adding Italy would be far-out.

Update: This is how it now looks in Carto Standard: osm.org/relation/4218385#map=16/47.0232/12.4152
As noted, when the dark/light blue lines disappear in the OSM Inspector geofabrik view tonight all should be well.

Let me recommend JOSM to you since seeing u are on ID Editor. JOSM is very good at diagnosing problems on complex multipolygon to include the relations editor has a button to download all members, up to including very big and signal issues *prior* to saving the edit set with a validator pane listing all problems great and small. It's a bit getting used to, took me a while to learn all the tricks it knows, to include an easy function to combine side sharing areas of same and converting multipolygons to simple polygons with it's 'reconstruct' function.

Feel free to let me know if things are still not 100% here, but mostly, OSMI and Osmose notify the mapper(s) that edited an object i.e. I will be told automatically by the daily and 12 hourly diagnostic reports

ciao

Hi,

This forest multipolygon, see osm.org/relation/4218385/history , needs a serious cleanup, inner areas that are no longer inner and inner areas that share a side which should have a single inner combo line drawn around them.

OSM Inspector shows this picture at the moment
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=12.41508&lat=47.01959&zoom=16&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&opacity=0.65&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

The dark blue is where inner is passing at least twice also flagged with duplicate segments. The light blue indicates an inner should be outer as well.

If you leave this area alone for the next 24 hours, I'll try to correct all the flagged problems, the net being that this forest is going to turn into 3 or 4 outer forest areas in a single multipolygon relation.

The Inspector view will update tonight sometime after 22:30

cheers