Reverted in osm.org/changeset/47050375

Aufräumer, bitte kommunizere zuerst mit dem jeweilgen ursprünglichen Mapper bevor du grossräumig löscht. Speziell sind die QA Tools nur als Hinweis für ein mögliches Problem zu sehen, nicht als absolute Wahrheit.

Hallo

Du gibts als Quelle für die Adressen "Thurgis" an. Kannst du bitte einen Link zu den Nutzungsbedingungen der Daten die du verwendet hast angeben, da es eine Neuigkeit wäre, dass solche Daten vom THurgau in OSM genutzt werden dürfen.

Gruss

Simon

Hi
Thank you for contributing to OpenStreetMap.

Given the nature of your contributions it seems as if you are using official GIS data to add features. Please only do this if you are able to provide the data on terms that are compatible with the contributor terms you agreed to. Further using a copyright symbol in your user name is neither appropriate nor has any legal significance.

When you are adding data please use appropriate tagging, in the case of this edit for example, yuo should likely be using a "hazard" tag and not adding a body of water that doesn't exist.

Hallp mapping!

Reverted in osm.org/changeset/45494216#map=19/47.39940/8.40091

Reverted in osm.org/changeset/45492913#map=19/47.40148/8.40107

Reverted in osm.org/changeset/45492803#map=19/47.40280/8.40244

highway=path is a legit tag do not change to footway just for pokemon go

Reverted in osm.org/changeset/45492367#map=19/47.40075/8.40174
please do not change service roads to footways when it is clear that they are used by cars,

Reverted in osm.org/changeset/45492249

Reverted in osm.org/changeset/45492170#map=17/47.40503/8.38749

Footways are always accessible by foot.

Note the revert here actually did the wrong thing, the previous tagging was wrong and should have actually been water_park, but the edit added a leisure_1=park which was wrong, the area is now tagged as a water_park.

Removed non existant footway

Reverted in osm.org/changeset/45491497
Note: please used changeset comments that reflect what you have actually changed.

Looks OK

Note ways in the forest that are wide enough for two track vehicles should be tagged as tracks, the changes near Holzmatt are probably not correct.

Likely OK

Footways or landuse seem to be a bit misaligned but otherwise OK

Reverted in osm.org/changeset/45491105 none of the extra tags were necessary.