SimonPoole's Comments
Changeset | When | Comment |
---|---|---|
156340991 | 9 months ago | Hoi, ich hab gesehen, dass die Adressen die du hier eingetragen hast in unserer Auswertung nicht auftauchen. Es scheint als ob du Deutsche Konventionen übernommen hast, die aber für die Schweiz nicht gelten. Speziell hast du die postalische Ortschaft in addr:suburb eingetragen anstatt in addr:city. Dafür hast du die politische Gemeinde in addr:city eingetragen was eine Deutsche (und IMHO auch dort nicht sinnvolle) Spezialität ist. Willst du das korrigieren, oder soll ich? |
151357334 | about 1 year ago | This was in Turgi, Baden, not in Windisch |
151262562 | about 1 year ago | No Problem. I was more asking because I'm assuming you actually wanted to change something and the revert wiped everything out including any good changes. |
151262562 | about 1 year ago | Hi, I reverted this changeset in osm.org/changeset/151265247 as it dragged ~1'000 nodes of railway lines all over the place. Could you give a short explanation of what you were trying to do? Thanks. |
151265247 | about 1 year ago | This was a revert of changeset osm.org/changeset/151262562 |
149418441 | over 1 year ago | Hallo surrli in diesen Edits hast du an den Enden von einigen Auffahrten ein amenity=parking_entrance gesagt. Beispiel osm.org/node/11777737037/history/1#map=19/47.58045/8.21344 . Das ist nicht sinnvoll für private Garagen sondern für Einfahrten zu Tiefparker und ähnliches gedacht. Ich hab die, die ich gesehen habe entfernt, aber die Auffahrten gelassen. Gruss Simon |
134936067 | over 2 years ago | Andy this would seem to be OK and in line with current practice in Switzerland. |
129300636 | over 2 years ago | I know that is painful:-/ |
129300636 | over 2 years ago | Hi you seem to be deleting lots of buildings and then replacing them with new ones. Even if you were the original contributor that would seem like a bad idea as in general we want to retain the history of objects. |
122256445 | over 2 years ago | addr:place refers to "any" non-street object at that level of localisation. A hamlet is just one example of such a situation, others include localities in alpine villages and so on. In the case of Paradeplatz you don't even need to take my word for it, both the GWR http://qa.poole.ch/ch-roads/allroads/261.html and the "official" street list from swisstopo agree that Paradeplatz isn't a street. |
127147141 | almost 3 years ago | Ich hab die Mehrfacheinträge für die Firma entfernt, dass ist definitiv nicht sinnvoll. Firmennamen in anderen Sprachen können mit name:en name:fr etc am gleichen Objekt eingetragen werden. |
122507840 | almost 3 years ago | Maarten das Problem ist, dass 'nirgendwo' stimmt nicht, in der Schweiz ist es im Augenblick üblich die Säulen einzeln zu erfassen. Eine Diskussion zur Modellierung findet übrigens im Augenblick auf talk-ch statt. |
127152353 | almost 3 years ago | Reverted in osm.org/changeset/127155901 |
127152212 | almost 3 years ago | Reverted in osm.org/changeset/127155928 |
127151643 | almost 3 years ago | Reverted in osm.org/changeset/127155985 |
127150735 | almost 3 years ago | Reverted in osm.org/changeset/127155985 |
127150647 | almost 3 years ago | Reverted in osm.org/changeset/127156003 |
127150546 | almost 3 years ago | Reverted in osm.org/changeset/127156042 Next time you notice a vandal pls notify the DWG via the "Report user" function. |
126084034 | almost 3 years ago | PS: Sempach Station is the "postalische Ortschaft" which is an independent concept used as the "city" level object in addresses which does not need to be an actual place or municipality. |
126084034 | almost 3 years ago | Yes, as said it is the "street level" object in addresses, but there is no -street- that has the name just the area which is what you are confirming, see also http://qa.poole.ch/ch-roads/allroads/1093.html |