But that is the place/"ortsteil" name which in many places in Switzerland serves as a replacement for the "street" part in a postal address, see also https://map.geo.admin.ch/?lang=en&topic=ech&bgLayer=ch.swisstopo.pixelkarte-farbe&layers=ch.swisstopo.zeitreihen,ch.bfs.gebaeude_wohnungs_register,ch.bav.haltestellen-oev,ch.swisstopo.swisstlm3d-wanderwege,ch.astra.wanderland-sperrungen_umleitungen,ch.swisstopo.amtliches-strassenverzeichnis&layers_opacity=1,1,1,0.8,0.8,0.85&layers_visibility=false,false,false,false,false,true&layers_timestamp=18641231,,,,,&E=2658550.50&N=1218460.25&zoom=11&catalogNodes=457,491

Hi

It would seem that there is no street named Adelwil in Adelwil according to official data. Do you have a street sign or similar that you could point to? Otherwise I would suspect that the relevant streets should have no name at all.

A couple of remarks:

- currently SchweizMobil data is off limits. We had a productive meeting with them and the BAV / Astra end of last year and there is some hope that this might change in the near future, but as this is an economic pain point for them things may come out differently. I'll reach out to them and find out what the current state is asap.

- If you are using third party sources always list them on the changeset.

- in general it is not a good idea to simply start using third party data without vetting that it is OK to use -beforehand-.

I agreed with the owner to make its access private. They are considering actually putting up a sign to that effect. I wouldn't delete the path as it is clearly visible and it will just get added back.

PS: as this is agriculturally used land, they can't actually stop people from accessing from a pure legal pov.

Hi, you added osm.org/way/184204868 in this changeset. SOSM has received a complaint that this is a private path. Can you by any chance remember if you surveyed this in person or added be other means?

Hallo, die Änderungen die du hier gemacht hast scheinen alle falsch zu sein, auf diesen Strassen war der Zugang für Motorfarhrzeuge schon auf den Zubringerdienst beschränkt alles andere ist falsch.

@Mashin while I can understand your sentiment, there is so much wrong with the import that it will be less work, including for the importer to redo it properly if it is even desired. In particular the overlapping data makes no sense at all to try and clean up "manually".

Hi, you seem to have added "lots" of data on top of the existing data in these changesets. Was this import discussed in any form with the community before? It is definitely technically defective.

Forgot to mention that the impetus for the edit was a note that pointed out that the pitch isn't a parking lot.

Hi, it is not clear if you actually wanted to add something here. If yes, please explain what you wanted to do.

Thanks

Hi, you seem to be deleting a very large number of building polygons in your recent changesets. Could you give some more information than just "Polygon Deleted" on why you are doing this?

Hallo und willkommen bei OSM. Danke für das fleissige Mappen.

Du hast bei den letzten paar Edits keinen richtigen Kommentar angegeben, es ist wirklich hilfreich, auch wenn manchmal repetitiv, wenn der Kommentar einen Hinweis auf die Änderungen beinhaltet. Siehe auch osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Einfach in online Editor ("iD"), nachdem das Objekt angewählt wurde, links im Objekttyp anwählen und im Suchfeld einen entsprechenden Begriff eingeben, Z.B. Blumen, dann sollten die passenden Vorlagen angezeigt werden.

Den Punkt in osm.org/changeset/117764160 entfernt.

Hallo ritualis

Was wolltest du mit deiner Änderung denn bewirken? Du hast hier nur einen Punkt mit einem Namen hinzugefügt aber kein eigentliches Objekt (der HB St. Gallen liegt ja auch nicht da).

Gruss

@Mathias Haugsbø that is clearly wrong. The name tag is only for facilities that commonly have a name and clearly not for ATMs, vending machines and, charging stations (all for which the NSI mistakenly suggests name tags).

I noticed that the multi-polygon besides being incredibly large had nodes as outer elements https://api.openstreetmap.org/api/0.6/relation/13671879/1 could you explain how you did that?

Partially undone in osm.org/changeset/115525178

Partiality undone in osm.org/changeset/115524916#map=12/46.4007/9.7533

Partially undone in osm.org/changeset/115524460#map=12/46.4671/9.8539