I've fixed a dodgy overlap at the north end of that which clearly didn't exist.
I've assumed that the inland path to osm.org/relation/77964 as I presume that that is where that is signed and routed now (my GPS traces here are from 8 years ago and may not be accurate any more).

Hello - it looks like this edit introduced a small spur to the Wales Coast Path - I've split osm.org/way/1390827060 so that hopefully it's contiguous again.

Hello,
It looks like osm.org/way/1379326419 had been accidentally missed from NCN4 - I've added it back.
Cheers,
Andy

The woodland at osm.org/way/148883959/history got deleted in this changeset. What were you trying to do?

Any idea what "building=s" is on osm.org/way/252175919#map=19/53.269303/-3.914435 ?

What sort of building is a "seb"? osm.org/way/1367284049 .

Hello,
Lots of the houses in this changeset are "building=semidetached_house100752" - I suspect that is a typo?
Regards,
Andy

Some of these building values were odd - I changed them in osm.org/changeset/165005490 .

Oops - looks like this added an extra bit to NCN425 4247567 here - I've removed it from the relation.

This changeset broke the Centenery WAy at osm.org/changeset/163340221#map=19/52.502942/-1.472353 . I've fixed it.

Oops - osm.org/way/1363664264 wasn't joined to the service road here.
I also filled in the gap in the Centenery Way.

Hello,
There seems to be a bit of an odd spur on a few route relations at osm.org/relation/1832946#map=19/51.626375/-1.013466 . Is that a mistake and do they all go to the south, or is there a bit through the field missing?
Affected relations can be seen at https://map.atownsend.org.uk/maps/map/map.html#19/51.62638/-1.01347 .
Best Regards,
Andy

It looks like one of these changes broke at least one relation - "12458163 | Kilconny ED". I've fixed it in osm.org/changeset/163005426 - does everything still look OK?

Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
I think that this edit might have introduced a gap in the Saxon_Shore_Way relation 8864. I've filled it in now:
osm.org/relation/8864#map=18/51.384666/0.523991
It might also be worth checking the other bus route relations - osm.org/way/1359466727 is in fewer than the way to the south.
Best Regards,
Andy

Hello,
I think that this edit might have introduced a gap in the Saxon Shore Way - I've filled that in in osm.org/relation/8864 .

Best Regards,
Andy

Hello,
I'm not sure what happened here, but one of the ways osm.org/way/273992803 seemed to get added to some relations more that once - it looks like it was already there with role "outer", but was added again with no role, which seemed to result in the relations dropping out of a rendering database. I've removed the duplicates, so the relations should appear again tomorrow.
Best Regards,
Andy

Hello jajanja3,
There's a gap in the Saxon Shore Way at osm.org/relation/8864#map=19/51.383975/0.507900 - do you know how it joins there?
Best Regards,
Andy

Hello,
I think this might have accidentally created a gap in the High Weald National Landscape relation 8815682 - I've filled it in in osm.org/changeset/161870811
Best Regards,
Andy

Hello - a quick question about osm.org/way/742792269/history . That was a "bridge=aqueduct" and "layer=1". It then changed to "bridge=aqueduct", "tunnel=culvert" and "layer=-1". I'm guessing that this might have been by accident, or is this bridge somehow also a tunnel (it doesn't look like one on the imagery)?
Best Regards,
Andy

I've added osm.org/way/1348130656/history back in to the AONB boundary ("9336138 | Chichester Harbour National Landscape"). Also osm.org/way/1348130654 .
Cheers,
Andy