After editing any paths involved in a hiking route relation (e.g. all the coastal ones!) it makes sense to check http://ra.osmsurround.org/analyzeRelation?relationId=77964&noCache=true&_noCache=on (where 77964 is the relation) so that it matches what is signed on the ground. There are obviously genuine duplications (high and low tide, whether paths across the ranges are open etc.) but there are some very dubious spurs still.

I've fixed a dodgy overlap at the north end of that which clearly didn't exist.
I've assumed that the inland path to osm.org/relation/77964 as I presume that that is where that is signed and routed now (my GPS traces here are from 8 years ago and may not be accurate any more).

Hello - it looks like this edit introduced a small spur to the Wales Coast Path - I've split osm.org/way/1390827060 so that hopefully it's contiguous again.

Hello,
It looks like osm.org/way/1379326419 had been accidentally missed from NCN4 - I've added it back.
Cheers,
Andy

The woodland at osm.org/way/148883959/history got deleted in this changeset. What were you trying to do?

Any idea what "building=s" is on osm.org/way/252175919#map=19/53.269303/-3.914435 ?

What sort of building is a "seb"? osm.org/way/1367284049 .

Hello,
Lots of the houses in this changeset are "building=semidetached_house100752" - I suspect that is a typo?
Regards,
Andy

Some of these building values were odd - I changed them in osm.org/changeset/165005490 .

Oops - looks like this added an extra bit to NCN425 4247567 here - I've removed it from the relation.

This changeset broke the Centenery WAy at osm.org/changeset/163340221#map=19/52.502942/-1.472353 . I've fixed it.

Oops - osm.org/way/1363664264 wasn't joined to the service road here.
I also filled in the gap in the Centenery Way.

Hello,
There seems to be a bit of an odd spur on a few route relations at osm.org/relation/1832946#map=19/51.626375/-1.013466 . Is that a mistake and do they all go to the south, or is there a bit through the field missing?
Affected relations can be seen at https://map.atownsend.org.uk/maps/map/map.html#19/51.62638/-1.01347 .
Best Regards,
Andy

It looks like one of these changes broke at least one relation - "12458163 | Kilconny ED". I've fixed it in osm.org/changeset/163005426 - does everything still look OK?

Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
I think that this edit might have introduced a gap in the Saxon_Shore_Way relation 8864. I've filled it in now:
osm.org/relation/8864#map=18/51.384666/0.523991
It might also be worth checking the other bus route relations - osm.org/way/1359466727 is in fewer than the way to the south.
Best Regards,
Andy

Hello,
I think that this edit might have introduced a gap in the Saxon Shore Way - I've filled that in in osm.org/relation/8864 .

Best Regards,
Andy

Hello,
I'm not sure what happened here, but one of the ways osm.org/way/273992803 seemed to get added to some relations more that once - it looks like it was already there with role "outer", but was added again with no role, which seemed to result in the relations dropping out of a rendering database. I've removed the duplicates, so the relations should appear again tomorrow.
Best Regards,
Andy

Hello jajanja3,
There's a gap in the Saxon Shore Way at osm.org/relation/8864#map=19/51.383975/0.507900 - do you know how it joins there?
Best Regards,
Andy

Hello,
I think this might have accidentally created a gap in the High Weald National Landscape relation 8815682 - I've filled it in in osm.org/changeset/161870811
Best Regards,
Andy

Hello - a quick question about osm.org/way/742792269/history . That was a "bridge=aqueduct" and "layer=1". It then changed to "bridge=aqueduct", "tunnel=culvert" and "layer=-1". I'm guessing that this might have been by accident, or is this bridge somehow also a tunnel (it doesn't look like one on the imagery)?
Best Regards,
Andy