I've added osm.org/way/1348130656/history back in to the AONB boundary ("9336138 | Chichester Harbour National Landscape"). Also osm.org/way/1348130654 .
Cheers,
Andy

There is a public footpath alongside the main runway osm.org/way/775413485 , and it is not so busy that you can't use it.

Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
After this edit, it looks like there is a gap in some administrative polygons. You can see one of them at osm.org/relation/5655372#map=19/53.947926/-8.874704 (and the gap's obvious within the iD editor, too).

Would you like any help fixing them?
Best Regards,
Andy

Hello,
I've never been here, but are you sure that it's really "billiards" that is played here and not "bar_billiards"? They are two different games. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bar_billiards has more detail. As a game, it's as different from billiards as table tennis is from tennis.
Best Regards,
Andy

Hello,
What should the name of Killaree be? I've set it back to Killaree, but maybe you were trying to change it to something else?

34408c34407
< -4818891 | Killaree
---
> -4818891 | ``

Cheers,
Andy

It's worth mentioning that coastal erosion here means that the cliff _will_ cross the road at some point, if it hasn't already.

Surely Grosmont is really two separate stations close together - one National Rail, one NYMR. They're totally separate organisations.

It looks like there's been a further roll-out of real-time displays - some that previously only had a timetable now have them.

The "alleged castle site" (which probably isn't one) is most likely under osm.org/way/503533422 to the north.

Hello,
Why do you believe that osm.org/way/697969816 is an unclassified road?
This appears to be related to https://maproulette.org/challenge/48118/task/229419556 which (according to the Maproulette website) you created. If that is true, what is that challenge trying to achieve?
Are you making these changes in a personal capacity or on behalf of a company?
Please reply at https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/maproulette-critique/116922/62 .
Best Regards,
Andy

Hello - does osm.org/way/247896493 comment to anything at the eastern end?
http://ra.osmsurround.org/analyzeMap?relationId=3149262 has some gaps in it, including there.
Best Regards,
Andy

Previously osm.org/node/989182241/history was tagged with a note "2-layer car park - don't merge nodes!".
Why did you merge the nodes?

Hello,
You have changed osm.org/node/283481300/history to a "railway=halt". It is not. The station is already mapped as osm.org/way/168176083
Can you please review these edits to remove any other duplications you may have added?

Hello,
I think that this might have accidentally created a gap in osm.org/relation/1957067 - I've filled it in by splitting osm.org/way/1301613924 in two and adding the relevant part to the relation.
Best Regards,
Andy

Hello,
Just to let you know , I've moved a few ways from the superroute osm.org/relation/9481976 to the part 1 route osm.org/relation/5479823 . It is confusing - in iD the relation id is hidden so it's not really clear what you're adding.
Best Regards,
Andy

Thanks!

Hello,
Just spotted you've changed the name of osm.org/relation/10529390 to be the description again rather than the name. I changed it in osm.org/changeset/142413576 following the broad consensus of https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/proposal-use-description-instead-of-name-for-route-relations/104656 . I tend to agree with the forum discussion in that once "from" and "to" have been added to superroute members the "name" should just be the name, but it is true that many relations (in the UK and elsewhere) do have descriptions as names - do you think it's worth raising it in the UK bit of the forum specifically?
Best Regards,
Andy

Hello - there's a problem with the Sperrins AONB at the moment, there are some duplicate entries in the boundary.
osm.org/way/1291745514 and osm.org/way/343718558 are two, but there are more.

I'm guessing that the "clothes=men" tag on osm.org/way/107045740 might not be valid any more?

I got a chance to map out some of the new trackways tonight. Some of the accesses (e.g. where the new car park will be, and from Moor Lane to the west) aren't open yet but some are (from Moor Lane to the north), so you can get most places internally. I'll try and upload and map those traces over the next couple of weeks or so. Next, weather permitting, I'll try and add the missing hedges, the internal fence details and where the trees exist already - some broadleaved ones are already poking out of their tubes at the eastern side.
Not looked at west of Moor Lane or south of Wetherby Road yet.