Right now the relation is tagged as

type=multipolygon
natural=water
tidal=yes

I've been working on other bodies of waters in North Carolina that seem to be rendering properly. Not sure why this is failing so badly. Maybe those will start failing too?

FWIW, osm.wiki/Tag:natural%3Dbay says that the bay should be enclosed by coastline, thus where I ended my edit several weeks ago. Perhaps this page should be updated?

I've now created a relation for the Eastern Bay and tagged it as natural=bay, along with all the other identifiers. I'll just wait to see if this renders appropriately or if I need to change it to "natural=water".

So, should this just be tagged as "natural=water"?

*sigh*
Okay, so originally this area was identified as the Miles River, which was incorrect. I reduced the Miles River to a location that seemed appropriate (based on maritime charts) and then tried to break up the area into the separate bays using relations. That seemed to fail pretty quickly. So, trying to follow what I read as the way to map bays, did this... and fail.

So, with all that in mind, this area is mainly the Eastern Bay with several smaller bays. How should this be mapped?

Yeah, I'm just holding my breath until the coastline is rendered again and I see blue. I've looked at all the data and I think it's all correct. :)

Sigh... This is not working as I had expected. I was trying to split up the four bays here but that seems to have failed. I just removed the individual multipolygons I added last night and just kept the individual nodes for the individual bays.

The original issue I was trying to fix was that the Miles River was consuming the entire area of Eastern Bay (and the other three bays). Maybe I've fixed this now?

Yeah, totally bummed that this happened! Was looking for an alternate route and thought that maybe US340 might be acceptable but the ATC says it's not a very wide road. I guess the upside is that it's not really hiking season.

I saw it used at another campground in NM. It's supposed to show the maximum length of the RV that can stay at that particular campground. Thinking about it more, however, I'm thinking maxlength would work as well.

I made changes to this building IAW the wiki.

Node 876504257 should be undeleted.

Sorry, that was some extra tags that accidentally got copy/pasted in. I've removed them. Thanks for catching it!

What kind of strange tags are you talking about?

Thanks for catching my error. Looks like you've fixed this for me already; thanks! I'm surprised that JOSM's validation engine didn't catch this when I did the upload.

As far as voltages are concerned, I have no idea. It's one of those things I hope to understand one day.

Opps, yes it was. So... I reverted that particular change as the wiki says that _link for residential isn't actually available.

I wonder if Peartree Road should actually be classified as a residential roadway at all.

Thanks for the catch here.

I couldn't find the exact road that was changed to residential_link. Could you point to it, please?

Yes, that's the only time I would have used those tags in the changeset. I'm trying to find that exact change to see the change because, like you said, that is incredibly... odd. :)

And... nope, loc_name without name doesn't render. I looked for additional input on the wiki and found directive showing that in lieu of a formal name that a local name should be used as name=* so I have reverted that change. All should be back to the way it was. Sorry about the mix up.

I'll compromise on this (in lieu of a formal source). I'll revert the change and make those trail names local names (loc_name) so that if an actual name gets used both will be in the data.

Can you point me to a definitive source for these trail names (DNR, County of Frederick, City of Frederick, etc)? Every source I can find says that the trails are not named and when I was in the area I found no trail names (although I didn't venture on all of them).

Oh, CHENEY Road. Sorry, I was thinking Cheneyville Road. I still can't recall seeing such signage but I will take a look and try to do a Mapillary survey next time I'm up that way.