OpenStreetMap-Logo OpenStreetMap

E-Mail-Symbol Bluesky-Symbol Facebook-Symbol LinkedIn-Symbol Mastodon-Symbol Telegram-Symbol X-Symbol

Diskussioun

Bemierkung vum mnirek de(n) 5. September 2013 um 16:11 Auer

Generally, you would know if you are doing it the way it has to take. And sometimes a big hurdle. They do not do badly, even worse.

Bemierkung vum Pieren de(n) 6. September 2013 um 09:17 Auer

I always campaigned against route relations on segments. This is the easy way fine for data consumers but not for contributors (the real ones, not the ones just talking or developing software). My alternative solution is to define the routes by junctions nodes lists. It’s still not perfect but I noticed that junction nodes are relatively more stable than any other elements in the OSM dataset. And it makes routes modeling less prominent.

Bemierkung vum malenki de(n) 6. September 2013 um 13:28 Auer

There is “replace geometry” in utilsplugin2 with which one can work very conveniently.
Other way to make this edit:
* split the way with the relations on it two times
* unglue the nodes of the segment
* insert the segment with all the relations where you like

Aloggen fir eng Bemierkung ze schreiwen