TTPC_Checksum's Comments
Changeset | Маца | Коммент |
---|---|---|
128967926 | 2шарал кӀезга хьалха | " I honestly never knew what I typed in this discussion would not be appropriate for OSM." Yet the off-topic text comments continue. Please start a blog instead and add a link to a map location. |
115012245 | 3шарал кӀезга хьалха | You're right - Rawls Creek is no longer there. I followed a misleading link last time. |
115012245 | 3шарал кӀезга хьалха | Hi, these areas are not parks. Rawls Creek Golf Club is still an active golf course. |
115012078 | 3шарал кӀезга хьалха | The driveway was already marked as private and does not connect to anything else. Routers will not send anyone down that driveway. But since the driveway is visible on imagery, it will be added again by someone else in the future. |
102677657 | 4шарал кӀезга хьалха | Wouldn't it be better to remove the building tag and leave the park? |
94958470 | 4шарал кӀезга хьалха | Driveways and service ways are used by delivery services to locate the end of the driveway, particularly useful in low visibility. They can be used by emergency services when enough are present. Buildings can always be added later. |
92380586 | 5 масех шо хьалха | That church was actually a common case of mistagging the whole area as building. The tagging should have been corrected instead of deleting the building. (Complex hadn't changed since ESRI Clarity, indicating that it's not recently changed). Restored in osm.org/changeset/92728709 |