Reverted SEO vandalism

osm.org/changeset/162456087

Reverted SEO vandalism

osm.org/changeset/162455016

Reverted SEO vandalism

osm.org/changeset/162455016

I have removed the names in osm.org/changeset/162437541

Hallo Wandelaar123,

Bij OpenStreetMap verwijderen we over het algemeen geen privé-objecten als deze nog bestaan. In plaats daarvan voegen we access=private toe. Meer hierover lees je op deze wiki pagina: osm.wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property Hoewel deze richtlijn over paden gaat, is het hier ook van toepassing.

Op de meest recente PDOK-beelden en satellietportaal beelden zie ik nog steeds een aantal jachttorens staan. Zie bijvoorbeeld: osm.org/edit?editor=id#map=21/52.1905798/6.1374518

Zou je kunnen toelichten hoe dit zit?
We hebben hierover ook een forumdiscussie lopen. Jouw uitleg zou hier gewaardeerd worden https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/nieuwe-mapper-verwijdert-data-uit-osm/99681/52

Met vriendelijke groet,
Taya Snijder
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group

Please see https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/gulf-of-america-gulf-of-mexico/124571 before editing the name of this feature. Undiscussed changes will be reverted.

osm.org/changeset/162433465

Please see https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/gulf-of-america-gulf-of-mexico/124571 before editing the name of this feature. Undiscussed changes will be reverted.

osm.org/changeset/162433465

Hello Mwiche
Thanks for your response,

When you load overpass querries in to JOSM it is really easy to forget about pre-existing objects that have not been loaded.

The things I mentioned do not have anything to do with satelite imagery, but rather with creating duplicated data.

Take for example this substation that you added osm.org/way/1359283573
It almost exactly overlaps with an older generic `landuse=industrial`. osm.org/way/1278826880
This means that there are now 2 objects that map the same thing. A better way to go about this is to update the already existing way.

Sincerely,
Taya Snijder

The same goes for these 2 lines which you duplicated

osm.org/way/438266583
osm.org/way/1359283572

Hello Mwiche,

Please check for pre-existing landuses. You again created a new way that overlapped an already existing one.
osm.org/way/1359283573
osm.org/way/1278826880

Sincerely,
Taya Snijder

Full or partial revert of changesets 162414471, 162414506, 162414537, 162414575, 162414665

osm.org/changeset/162416531

Full or partial revert of changesets 162414471, 162414506, 162414537, 162414575, 162414665

osm.org/changeset/162416531

Full or partial revert of changesets 162414471, 162414506, 162414537, 162414575, 162414665

osm.org/changeset/162416531

Full or partial revert of changesets 162414471, 162414506, 162414537, 162414575, 162414665

osm.org/changeset/162416531

Full or partial revert of changesets 162414471, 162414506, 162414537, 162414575, 162414665

osm.org/changeset/162416531

Full or partial revert of changesets 162413774, 162413882, 162413882

osm.org/changeset/162416508

Full or partial revert of changesets 162413774, 162413882, 162413882

osm.org/changeset/162416508

Oops, that should have been commented in osm.org/changeset/162410835

Deleted in osm.org/changeset/162415813

Gulf of Mexico already exists here
osm.org/node/305639190

Deleted in osm.org/changeset/162415813

Gulf of Mexico already exists here
osm.org/node/305639190