Reverted destruction of data DWG Ticket#2025072710000131

osm.org/changeset/169559960

Reverted destruction of data DWG Ticket#2025072710000131

osm.org/changeset/169559960

Reverted destruction of data DWG Ticket#2025072710000131

osm.org/changeset/169559960

Reverted destruction of data DWG Ticket#2025072710000131

osm.org/changeset/169559960

Reverted destruction of data DWG Ticket#2025072710000131

osm.org/changeset/169559960

Reverted destruction of data DWG Ticket#2025072710000131

osm.org/changeset/169559960

*most recent

Reverted questionable edit

osm.org/changeset/169431263

Hello Evegance, thank you for your report. Please seehttps://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18474

Reverted fake pokemon go edits DWG Ticket#2025072410000403

osm.org/changeset/169414877

Reverted fake pokemon go edits DWG Ticket#2025072410000403

osm.org/changeset/169414877

Reverted fake pokemon go edits DWG Ticket#2025072410000403

osm.org/changeset/169414877

Reverted fake pokemon go edits DWG Ticket#2025072410000403

osm.org/changeset/169414877

Reverted fake pokemon go edits DWG Ticket#2025072410000403

osm.org/changeset/169414877

Hello BholeKiBhasam,

The waterways you added in this area all seem to be intermittent if I look at the aerial imagery. Why did you add `intermittent=no` here?

I was also wondering why all the ways you're adding are so small? This generally is more prone to errors as it requires tagging a lot more ways. It also makes looking through changesets more difficult, as everything is spread across many tiny changesets. You might want to consider making your changesets a bit bigger.

Best regards,
Taya Snijder

Hello BholeKiBhasam,

You've added `intermittent=no + layer=-1 + tunnel=culvert` to a lot of the waterways here. Was this intentional?

Best regards,
Taya Snijder

Hello BholeKiBhasam,

What you're mapping as natural=ridge here aren't actually ridges. Just the edges of the lakebed. These are simply intermittent bodies of water.

Best regards,
Taya Snijder

Creating multiple sockpuppet accounts, repeatedly deleting data and targeting a specific user is absolutely considered vandalism.

These vandal accounts clearly want these trails to exist in real life. They want to use the trails, yet at the same time they're complaining about how mapping these trails could damage habitats, increase erosion, or even destroy archaeological sites.

They talk about people getting injured or endangering themselves and yet at the same time they're ignoring how mapping a trail can prevent people from getting lost or how they can be used by search and rescue to find missing people.

What I am seeing here is a bunch of people that want to enjoy the trails they created on land they don't own and are getting upset about other people that also don't own this land also using said trails. That is not a valid argument, that's just entitlement.

Best regards,
Taya Snijder

Please see
osm.org/user_blocks/18460
osm.org/user_blocks/18461

Reverted vandalism by user 'AdamLanzaTheDieselVideoEditor3450HD' DWG ticket #2025071510000055

osm.org/changeset/168944858