Hello, I have reverted this changeset. private properties can be mapped on OSM with no issues. See this wiki page for more information: osm.wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property

The best way to indicate that a road is private is to add access=private. The mass removal of features that are present on the ground is not acceptable.

osm.org/changeset/154772149

Hello, I have reverted this changeset. private properties can be mapped on OSM with no issues. See this wiki page for more information: osm.wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property

The best way to indicate that a road is private is to add access=private. The mass removal of features that are present on the ground is not acceptable.

osm.org/changeset/154772149

Hello, I have reverted this changeset. private properties can be mapped on OSM with no issues. See this wiki page for more information: osm.wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property

The best way to indicate that a road is private is to add access=private. The mass removal of features that are present on the ground is not acceptable.

osm.org/changeset/154772092

Hello, I have reverted this changeset. private properties can be mapped on OSM with no issues. See this wiki page for more information: osm.wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property

The best way to indicate that a road is private is to add access=private. The mass removal of features that are present on the ground is not acceptable.

osm.org/changeset/154772092

Hello, I have reverted this changeset. private properties can be mapped on OSM with no issues. See this wiki page for more information: osm.wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property

The best way to indicate that a road is private is to add access=private. The mass removal of features that are present on the ground is not acceptable.

osm.org/changeset/154772092

Hello, I have reverted this changeset. private properties can be mapped on OSM with no issues. See this wiki page for more information: osm.wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property

The best way to indicate that a road is private is to add access=private. The mass removal of features that are present on the ground is not acceptable.

osm.org/changeset/154772092

Hello, I have reverted this changeset. private properties can be mapped on OSM with no issues. See this wiki page for more information: osm.wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property

The best way to indicate that a road is private is to add access=private. The mass removal of features that are present on the ground is not acceptable.

osm.org/changeset/154772092

Hello, I have reverted this changeset. private properties can be mapped on OSM with no issues. See this wiki page for more information: osm.wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property

The best way to indicate that a road is private is to add access=private. The mass removal of features that are present on the ground is not acceptable.

osm.org/changeset/154772092

Hello, I have reverted this changeset. private properties can be mapped on OSM with no issues. See this wiki page for more information: osm.wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property

The best way to indicate that a road is private is to add access=private. The mass removal of features that are present on the ground is not acceptable.

osm.org/changeset/154772092

Hello, I have reverted this changeset. private properties can be mapped on OSM with no issues. See this wiki page for more information: osm.wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property

The best way to indicate that a road is private is to add access=private. The mass removal of features that are present on the ground is not acceptable.

osm.org/changeset/154772092

Hello, I have reverted this changeset. private properties can be mapped on OSM with no issues. See this wiki page for more information: osm.wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property

The best way to indicate that a road is private is to add access=private. The mass removal of features that are present on the ground is not acceptable.

osm.org/changeset/154772092

Hello, I have reverted this changeset. private properties can be mapped on OSM with no issues. See this wiki page for more information: osm.wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property

The best way to indicate that a road is private is to add access=private. The mass removal of features that are present on the ground is not acceptable.

osm.org/changeset/154772092

changeset message was supposed to be: added wikidata tags

Hello, when adding changeset comments, please use this guide: osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Changeset comments are meant to inform other users what your changeset did. A comment like "1 object(s) created." explains nothing to other users. Instead consider explaining what you added/changed/deleted. In this case something like "added bench" would have been much clearer.

Sincerely,
Taya

I do not see this quarry on any of the aerials. Do you have a source for this?

I have reverted the changes you made to the salt ponds. You even incorrectly retagged a bunch of the intermittent water basins to salt ponds.

Why did you remove the water related tags from the salt ponds? This is not correct as they still contain intermittent water

Deze gebruiker heeft hier weer highway=primary aan toegevoegd osm.org/changeset/154247026

AUB ook niet dit soort dingen als scrub taggen osm.org/way/1151610223 Hier kun je prima doorheen lopen, dus dit zal zeker geen scrub zijn
Groeten,
Taya

Scrub word gebruikt voor houtachtige planten die groter zijn dan heide en kleiner dan bomen. Je kunt hier meer over lezen op de OSM wiki osm.wiki/Tag:natural=scrub (Ook word dit in nederland gebruikt voor duingebieden. )
Lang gras tussen weilanden zal geen scrub zijn. Dit is beter getagged als natural=grassland of landuse=gras.

Hier overlapt de scrub die je hebt toegevoegd met de weilanden. Dit is incorrect.
osm.org/way/1299344900
osm.org/way/108943798
Ga jij dit ook nog fixen?