Taya_S's Comments
Changeset | When | Comment |
---|---|---|
154756824 | about 1 year ago | Hello, I have reverted this changeset. private properties can be mapped on OSM with no issues. See this wiki page for more information: osm.wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property The best way to indicate that a road is private is to add access=private. The mass removal of features that are present on the ground is not acceptable. |
154756816 | about 1 year ago | Hello, I have reverted this changeset. private properties can be mapped on OSM with no issues. See this wiki page for more information: osm.wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property The best way to indicate that a road is private is to add access=private. The mass removal of features that are present on the ground is not acceptable. |
154756745 | about 1 year ago | Hello, I have reverted this changeset. private properties can be mapped on OSM with no issues. See this wiki page for more information: osm.wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property The best way to indicate that a road is private is to add access=private. The mass removal of features that are present on the ground is not acceptable. |
154756733 | about 1 year ago | Hello, I have reverted this changeset. private properties can be mapped on OSM with no issues. See this wiki page for more information: osm.wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property The best way to indicate that a road is private is to add access=private. The mass removal of features that are present on the ground is not acceptable. |
154756670 | about 1 year ago | Hello, I have reverted this changeset. private properties can be mapped on OSM with no issues. See this wiki page for more information: osm.wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property The best way to indicate that a road is private is to add access=private. The mass removal of features that are present on the ground is not acceptable. |
154756610 | about 1 year ago | Hello, I have reverted this changeset. private properties can be mapped on OSM with no issues. See this wiki page for more information: osm.wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property The best way to indicate that a road is private is to add access=private. The mass removal of features that are present on the ground is not acceptable. |
154756540 | about 1 year ago | Hello, I have reverted this changeset. private properties can be mapped on OSM with no issues. See this wiki page for more information: osm.wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property The best way to indicate that a road is private is to add access=private. The mass removal of features that are present on the ground is not acceptable. |
154756523 | about 1 year ago | Hello, I have reverted this changeset. private properties can be mapped on OSM with no issues. See this wiki page for more information: osm.wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property The best way to indicate that a road is private is to add access=private. The mass removal of features that are present on the ground is not acceptable. |
154756512 | about 1 year ago | Hello, I have reverted this changeset. private properties can be mapped on OSM with no issues. See this wiki page for more information: osm.wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property The best way to indicate that a road is private is to add access=private. The mass removal of features that are present on the ground is not acceptable. |
154756507 | about 1 year ago | Hello, I have reverted this changeset. private properties can be mapped on OSM with no issues. See this wiki page for more information: osm.wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property The best way to indicate that a road is private is to add access=private. The mass removal of features that are present on the ground is not acceptable. |
154756321 | about 1 year ago | Hello, I have reverted this changeset. private properties can be mapped on OSM with no issues. See this wiki page for more information: osm.wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property The best way to indicate that a road is private is to add access=private. The mass removal of features that are present on the ground is not acceptable. |
154756238 | about 1 year ago | Hello, I have reverted this changeset. private properties can be mapped on OSM with no issues. See this wiki page for more information: osm.wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property The best way to indicate that a road is private is to add access=private. The mass removal of features that are present on the ground is not acceptable. |
154756003 | about 1 year ago | Hello, I have reverted this changeset. private properties can be mapped on OSM with no issues. See this wiki page for more information: osm.wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property The best way to indicate that a road is private is to add access=private. The mass removal of features that are present on the ground is not acceptable. |
154746134 | about 1 year ago | Hello, I have reverted this changeset. private properties can be mapped on OSM with no issues. See this wiki page for more information: osm.wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property The best way to indicate that a road is private is to add access=private. The mass removal of features that are present on the ground is not acceptable. |
154746053 | about 1 year ago | Hello, I have reverted this changeset. private properties can be mapped on OSM with no issues. See this wiki page for more information: osm.wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property The best way to indicate that a road is private is to add access=private. The mass removal of features that are present on the ground is not acceptable. |
154664836 | about 1 year ago | changeset message was supposed to be: added wikidata tags |
154509248 | about 1 year ago | Hello, when adding changeset comments, please use this guide: osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments Changeset comments are meant to inform other users what your changeset did. A comment like "1 object(s) created." explains nothing to other users. Instead consider explaining what you added/changed/deleted. In this case something like "added bench" would have been much clearer. Sincerely,
|
154483105 | about 1 year ago | I do not see this quarry on any of the aerials. Do you have a source for this? |
154489589 | about 1 year ago | I have reverted the changes you made to the salt ponds. You even incorrectly retagged a bunch of the intermittent water basins to salt ponds. |
154489589 | about 1 year ago | Why did you remove the water related tags from the salt ponds? This is not correct as they still contain intermittent water |