Sorry for digging up such an old changeset Andrew, but isn't this a real business address? I checked their website https://www.levelmaster.com.au/about-us/ and it appears that their office is indeed located here. Sure the description could be removed, but all other address, name, hours, contact info, could be kept right?
I only noticed as they opened a new note in October 2024, trying to add it back in again. osm.org/note/4493171

Hey nevw. I can't see any issues in geofabrik. I checked each filter but there's nothing displaying.

I realise now you've fixed it in changeset #161401170 thank you! Silly mistake on my part. I know not to do that in future.

Hi Tanker3278, thank you for the map contributions. OpenStreetMap changeset comments serve as a way to better understand the changes other mappers make - collaboration is crucial. Could you please consider writing more informative comments instead of "Location Updates"?
Please read the wiki page: osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Hey Dondayevsky, welcome to OpenStreetMap.
We are not allowed to copy anything from Google, including their StreetView imagery. See osm.wiki/Google where it's explained that "The Google Maps Terms of Use explicitly forbid using Google Maps content - both map data and Google Street View - for making any other content. It includes using them for OSM mapping."
Additionally, the residential area you've added shouldn't be named at all. Also, it's overlapping the Wirilda Street Park. You should make that an inner to the landuse relation or map the residential area around it.

This changeset has been reverted as Scrubby Creek is not a canal or canal lock. No reply on the original changeset 155264053 in over a month.

osm.org/changeset/156988161

Thanks for resolving this one Fizzie.

Hi Juveria Vasim and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
It appears you've changed Scrubby Creek from a stream into a canal lock. If you check the wiki, canal locks don't really match what's on the ground along Scrubby Creek. osm.wiki/Key:lock
I'd suggest you check out the tags for rivers, creeks, and streams and change the tags over to a more suitable type.
osm.wiki/Key:waterway
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/155264053

Hey Map-Finder. Please use meaningful changeset comments. "updates & alignments at A7" does not help other mappers understand what you are doing. Please read osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Are you sure the poles are vents and not light posts? Have you visited this park again? I found these when looking up fix-me requests.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136018997

Hey Swavu. Is it unnecessary to tag roundabouts with oneway? I've always ticked it as in iD when viewing the way it's 'assumed yes' but I thought it would be better to say 'yes'.
I can change my methods if it's unnecessary to tag it that way. I don't want to cause any grief.

Does the park really jut out to the north into Inverell Court? Bing and Esri only show a residential property there.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145783602

That article says they have a boat shed and a single classroom space. But agreed, I can't re-find any public resource that says this building is part of the TAFE so I've retagged it as a residential area in changeset 147643169. Thanks for the correction.

I referenced Energex's 'Look up and Live' map. According to them there's both 11kV HV and 415V LV lines overhead in these areas. I suppose a duplicate set of ways could be drawn for the LV lines? Or I should've put both on the one way?

Ahh rats. Cheers Jono. Fixed in this changeset: osm.org/changeset/140036262

Thanks for the tip and link nevw. I believe I've fixed the errors in this changeset: osm.org/changeset/139114228

I've still got some more ungluing to do around the industrial area.

Cheers Jono. I've corrected my mistake in changeset 133230958. Also added the art gallery inside too. I didn't realise I'd used the wrong website for the customer service centre. I've also corrected that in changeset 133231019.

Cheers for the info Scottie. I've removed the turn restrictions in changeset 128059046

Hey Scottie. Any intersections in particular? I'm looking at node 267121617 but aerial imagery makes it look like a right-turn into the side street would be illegal. Or is that allowed now?
Do you think I should remove all of the turn restrictions I placed based on these triangular traffic islands or are some valid?
Such as the intersections at nodes: 9591503062 , 9591503119 , and 9591503097.

Thanks nevw. I've fixed my error here: osm.org/changeset/125837276

Ah sure thing. Thanks nevw. I've fixed it in changeset 123782211.