This changeset has been reverted as Scrubby Creek is not a canal or canal lock. No reply on the original changeset 155264053 in over a month.

osm.org/changeset/156988161

Thanks for resolving this one Fizzie.

Hi Juveria Vasim and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
It appears you've changed Scrubby Creek from a stream into a canal lock. If you check the wiki, canal locks don't really match what's on the ground along Scrubby Creek. osm.wiki/Key:lock
I'd suggest you check out the tags for rivers, creeks, and streams and change the tags over to a more suitable type.
osm.wiki/Key:waterway
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/155264053

Hey Map-Finder. Please use meaningful changeset comments. "updates & alignments at A7" does not help other mappers understand what you are doing. Please read osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Are you sure the poles are vents and not light posts? Have you visited this park again? I found these when looking up fix-me requests.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136018997

Hey Swavu. Is it unnecessary to tag roundabouts with oneway? I've always ticked it as in iD when viewing the way it's 'assumed yes' but I thought it would be better to say 'yes'.
I can change my methods if it's unnecessary to tag it that way. I don't want to cause any grief.

Does the park really jut out to the north into Inverell Court? Bing and Esri only show a residential property there.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145783602

That article says they have a boat shed and a single classroom space. But agreed, I can't re-find any public resource that says this building is part of the TAFE so I've retagged it as a residential area in changeset 147643169. Thanks for the correction.

I referenced Energex's 'Look up and Live' map. According to them there's both 11kV HV and 415V LV lines overhead in these areas. I suppose a duplicate set of ways could be drawn for the LV lines? Or I should've put both on the one way?

Ahh rats. Cheers Jono. Fixed in this changeset: osm.org/changeset/140036262

Thanks for the tip and link nevw. I believe I've fixed the errors in this changeset: osm.org/changeset/139114228

I've still got some more ungluing to do around the industrial area.

Cheers Jono. I've corrected my mistake in changeset 133230958. Also added the art gallery inside too. I didn't realise I'd used the wrong website for the customer service centre. I've also corrected that in changeset 133231019.

Cheers for the info Scottie. I've removed the turn restrictions in changeset 128059046

Hey Scottie. Any intersections in particular? I'm looking at node 267121617 but aerial imagery makes it look like a right-turn into the side street would be illegal. Or is that allowed now?
Do you think I should remove all of the turn restrictions I placed based on these triangular traffic islands or are some valid?
Such as the intersections at nodes: 9591503062 , 9591503119 , and 9591503097.

Thanks nevw. I've fixed my error here: osm.org/changeset/125837276

Ah sure thing. Thanks nevw. I've fixed it in changeset 123782211.

Thanks Jon. I've been using Open Infra Map as a guide for where to add more powerlines where there should be some. I've found this page osm.wiki/Classification_of_power_lines which will also help a lot. I've retagged the lines as power=minor_line as you suggested in changeset osm.org/changeset/122357703

Thanks Jon. Not sure why I marked them as 33kV. Corrected to 11kV in changeset 122355592 here: osm.org/changeset/122355592

Thanks Scottie

You've been making changes with inferior quality comments for more than 2 years now.
See changesets 117886609, 83785069, or 83082869 as a random sample.
"I'll be better in future" is impossible to believe at this point.
Just leave the existing elements there and make quality changeset comments, it's not that hard.
How do OSM elements possibly interfere with your LiDAR scans anyway?