Timmy_Tesseract's Comments
Changeset | When | Comment |
---|---|---|
100688862 | over 4 years ago | Hello Cabinet23. Thank you for your contributions to OSM. When you find things to be in the wrong location please just move them instead of deleting and creating a new object. I've restored the old nodes for Barangays 87 and 90 (see changeset 103285918) as they had many other tags in addition to just name and place. This also preserves the past edit history. By the way, the correct place tag for barangays is village or quarter. Town is meant for municipalities. For more details you could check the OSM wiki. Keep up the good work! |
59469530 | over 4 years ago | Hello Seasalt. What is the source for the name of this village? |
102258465 | over 4 years ago | Hello lawrence_ruiz. Thank you for your contributions. This mountain is quite far away from any actual peak. You could use OpenTopoMap to see the elevation profile of the area. I already moved it to the nearest possible location, do you wanna check if I got it right? Keep up the good work! |
102770134 | over 4 years ago | It is clearly visible on aerial imagery that there are no fords at node 8620445559 and 8620445558 and that the lower parts of the stream that you added takes a very different course than what you mapped. Also I have on the ground knowledge that there is no bridge at way 929514995. Please don't add non-existent things to OSM. |
102897184 | over 4 years ago | Hello. Please have a look at the local as well as the general mapping conventions for road classifications. None of the roads that you upgraded to primary and trunk seem to meet the definitions. Also please have a look at osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments. Sarangani is hundreds of kilometers away from the edits in this changeset and "Waypoint" does not describe well the huge amount of changes to well established road classifications that you made. |
102777975 | over 4 years ago | Good day gillhsu. The road link that you added (way 929553066) does not exist. Please only connect roads when they're clearly visible on aerial imagery. As for way 929553067, this would be better tagged as service than unclassified. There are detailled descriptions of all highway tags on the OSM wiki. Happy mapping! |
102777841 | over 4 years ago | Good day yuehtsai, please always make sure to download all the existing data in an area before adding new roads. This way you will avoid adding duplicates of roads that already exist in the database. Also please have a look at the definitions of motorway and residential roads. I've reverted this changeset. |
100602881 | over 4 years ago | Thank you for reassessing this. Keep up the good work! |
97873610 | over 4 years ago | Thank you for having another look. Keep up the good work! |
101291230 | over 4 years ago | Hello. What is your source for the separated lanes at way 542743944? I've passed by this road many times and there is no such separation. This can also clearly be seen on aerial imagery. and strava heatmaps. |
87203219 | over 4 years ago | Hello Dolf. You might have missed the second part of the trunk definition: "Continuous stretch of highway between large cities (population 100,000+)" ;) |
100602881 | over 4 years ago | Good day HikkaduwaBeach. What guidelines are you using for deciding on road classifications? It seems that the previous classification of the roads leading to the municipalities of Tarangnan and Pagsanghan were in accordance with the local mapping conventions. |
100230874 | over 4 years ago | Good day Raenbow. For entrances and exits to underground or multi storey parking facilities there's the more specific tag amenity=parking_entrance. Thank you. |
97873610 | over 4 years ago | Hello AntelopeCliif. It is difficult to assess road classifications from aerial imagery alone, even more so if roads are barely visible due to high building density. Please always check way histories. Many of the previous classifications were based on ground surveys. |
98699733 | over 4 years ago | Good day RockCreekPark. Naujan is a major municipality with more than 100'000 inhabitants. It seems that the previous classification of this road was in accordance with the local mapping conventions. |
101468680 | over 4 years ago | Good evening. What source are these numbers based on? Only numbers assigned by DPWH should be used with ref tag on roads. |
101019944 | over 4 years ago | Hello again. Which bank in Sirib? Please read osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments.
|
101022995 | over 4 years ago | Hello sveeb. What would you like to have updated about bukidnon road? Also please read the conventions that the community has for road classifications (osm.wiki/Philippines/Mapping_conventions). For example the roads connecting Magkuno to the highway are very minor roads in comparison to the existing tertiary roads connecting from Crossing Quarry and Crossing 20 to Angalan/Balengaeng. |
100451374 | over 4 years ago | Hello superwaih, please make sure to download all the existing data in an area before adding new objects to avoid duplications. And please check the OSM road classification guidelines, those road that you tagged as tertiary and primary are all just residentials. Thank you. |
99734758 | over 4 years ago | Good day BidasoaRiver of course, sorry for the mix-up. |