Please pay attention to your tagging. You mapped these light poles as lighthouses. Like, what ships use to avoid big rocks.

3 different people have mapped this garden now. This is looking like some kind of class activity? Please coordinate so you aren't duplicating data :)

Welcome to OpenStreetMap. What exactly were you trying to add in this edit? The tagging you used has marked this location as a college. I'm not sure that is appropriate. Please see the wiki for what this tag is intended for: osm.wiki/Tag:amenity=college

Welcome to OpenStreetMap. What exactly were you trying to add in this edit? The tagging you used has marked this location as a college. I'm not sure that is appropriate. Please see the wiki for what this tag is intended for: osm.wiki/Tag:amenity=college

Hi and welcome to OpenStreetMap! Thank you for your additions to the map in Hays. I'm over in Manhattan, KS and try to keep an eye on things in Kansas. Feel free to send me a private message if you have any questions.

Hi. What exactly were you trying to add here? You drew an outline but didn't mark what it is supposed to represent.

This changeset has been reverted as vandalism after discussion on the talk-us mailing list. If you believe this to be in error, please engage with the community before making any further edits. osm.org/changeset/34028387

This changeset has been reverted as vandalism after discussion on the talk-us mailing list. If you believe this to be in error, please engage with the community before making any further edits. osm.org/changeset/34028387

This changeset has been reverted as vandalism after discussion on the talk-us mailing list. If you believe this to be in error, please engage with the community before making any further edits. osm.org/changeset/34028387

This changeset has been reverted as vandalism after discussion on the talk-us mailing list. These two nodes in particular seem like they might be legitimate but given this user's past behavior, all edits are being reverted until they engage with the community. osm.org/changeset/34028387

This changeset has been reverted as vandalism after discussion on the talk-us mailing list. If you believe this to be in error, please engage with the community before making any further edits. osm.org/changeset/34028387

This changeset has been reverted as vandalism after discussion on the talk-us mailing list. If you believe this to be in error, please engage with the community before making any further edits. osm.org/changeset/34028387

This changeset has been reverted as vandalism after discussion on the talk-us mailing list. If you believe this to be in error, please engage with the community before making any further edits. osm.org/changeset/34028387

The store locator on 7-eleven.com does not list this as a valid location. Also, you mapped it twice.

Please explain to me how it makes sense to have both US 24 and US 81 tagged as trunk.

US 24: 2 lanes, undivided, 65 MPH, 2 or 3 foot shoulder, lots of random driveways and farm access roads connecting to it.

US 81: 4 lanes, divided (by a 50 foot median), 70 MPH, 10 foot shoulder, more (but not completely) limited access.

Also, why should US 24 change classifications just because it crosses US 281? It is still a US highway, it is still two lanes, it is still undivided and its speed limit is still 65 MPH.

If you want the government's opinion on roads, go to the government, not OpenStreetMap. We map what is visible on the ground. I do not plan on consulting a government database every time before I edit OSM.

This reminds me... I think we've discussed classifications before and I strongly disagree with your upgrades of a lot of unpaved county roads in eastern Kansas to secondary. And here's why: I recently took one of these roads west out of KCK. I was expecting a reliable and safe road, as one should from a secondary. But suddenly the pavement ended and I was in the middle of a bunch of corn. Well ok. Not the end of the world. But then a sign appeared warning me that the road sometimes floods. This probably means that the road is not well enough traveled to make it worth building a bridge over a (mostly dry) creek or low lying area. That should not be tagged as secondary, I don't care WHAT the government says! In fact, I would classify that particular upgrade to secondary as downright dangerous.

It seems you were a little over-zealous in your tracktype mapping :) You added it to a paved road currently tagged as secondary: osm.org/way/13317973 although I'm probably going to change it to tertiary. State highway ends at the Kansas border and it is just a county road in Kansas.

You added a point with nothing but a name on it. While this will result in a name search correctly finding this location, you have not actually indicated that this is a dental office. If you go back to edit, click on the point you created and then click on the "Point" in the upper left of the window you can type "dentist" in the search box and flag this location so that it will show up correctly on the map and in searches. Also, you can add details like address, phone number and website to the point.

The buildings south of Marie Street seem oddly cropped at a specific straight line. Is this building data from an external source?

Hi and welcome to OpenStreetMap. That was a pretty respectable first edit! I've been mapping in Manhattan, KS for a few years now and keep an eye out for new users in Kansas.

I see you added a lot of businesses but didn't include names on most of them. What's up with that? :)

Also, I'm guessing you are using Internet Explorer? If you click the "Edit" button in another browser it should launch a newer editor that is (IMO) even easier to use. Just an FYI.

Hello and thank you for your contributions to the map! A minor thing to be aware of: The first address field is intended for only the house number, not the entire address. This makes things work better in address searches. I changed some things on The Living Room and added some building outlines and parking lot details in the area :)