Jeg har nok ikke vært på ski der etter at rulleskitraseen ble laget. Det virker logisk at skiløypene er lagt om og nå følger rullekitraseen. Tror du trygt kan endre. 👍

You have deleted several cross country skiing tracks around here.

You are also changing lots of ways from highway=path to highway=footway.

Please stop this imiediately!

Vibrog, ser at da du la inn denne for åtte år siden, så la du den inn uten highway-tag. Ser også at highway=path har blitt lagt til av noen andre i ettertid.

Dette betyr kanskje at du mente det ikke var noen sti her i dag, men at dette var den mest sannsynlige traseen for oltdidsveien?

Nå ja. åtte år er lang tid, så har forståelse for om du ikke husker.

Marking it with access=private would mean that all transport modes were illegal, including walking.

I've reverted the changeset. That the path is on private property, is no good reason to delete it.

Nei, dessverre, det vet jeg ikke. Jeg bruker ikke OsmAnd selv. Du kan forsøke å spørre på forumet eller i IRC-kanalen. På IRC er terskelen terskelen for å spørre lav og man får ofte svar nesten med en gang.

Hei! Dalene i Oslo ligger allerede i Openstreetmap (lagt inn som en linje som følger dalbunnen). natural=valley vises ikke på det vanlige kartet, men vises på en del andre kart som bruker data fra OSM, f.eks. dette: https://en.mapy.cz/zakladni?x=10.8537023&y=59.8669256&z=12

Grunneieren kan neppe på bakgrunn av friluftsloven § 3 første ledd nekte ferdsel til fots eller med sykkel på Børterveien, selv om han setter opp både gjerder og andre stengsler. Han kan imidlertid nekte ferdsel over selve gårdstunet med hjemmel i § 3a første ledd. Den delen av veien som krysser tunet kan merkes access=private. Da vil man ikke rutes over veien. Resten av veien kan merkes med motor_vehicle=private, slik Noen har foreslått.

Er ikke ferdselsforbud hvis det ikke er forbudt å ferdes der.

Excellent.

Indeed, it doesn't look like that.

I think I only changed the tagging from building=yes + building:type=industrial to building=industrial.

The building has probably been demolished since it was mapped 9 years ago.

Why do you use two tags for each image?

On closer inspection, I see that you didn't split thew highway, but rather added an area:highway, duplicating all the highway tags, in order to add the Mapilary photos. Seems rather meaningless.

Seems like you are still splitting ways just to add Mapillary photos, for example <osm.org/way/911547682#map=19/59.92298/10.82358< or <osm.org/way/911547687#map=19/59.92285/10.82353>.

Har kommunen fattet vedtak?

... candidate.

kunyasobe: The reason I replied here, and not to the private messages you sent me, is that I belive it is better to have an open and transparent discussion where everybody can participate. That's the opposite of trying to monopolize things.

You seem to ignore that OSM is not intended to be a copy of official maps.

And to answer the only question you seem to care about: I do agree that some places could be downgraded from place=suburb to place=quarter or place=neighbourhood. Meyerløkka would be a perfect candate.

The Municipality of Oslo's administrative 'bydeler' do not follow the traditional subdivisions of the city and the names in ordinary use. They have devided the city into 'bydeler' for administrative purposes. The guidelines on the wiki page that I linked to, explicitly state that place=suburb is not the same as the administrative subdivision 'bydel'. The 'delbydeler' are used for statistical purposes. The names of the 'delbydeler' are just labels, not real place names. The 'delbydel' of Skullerud, for instance, is much larger than both the present day suburb of Skullerud and the land that originally belonged to the farm that has given name to the suburb. Another example is Bispevika. It's the bay east of the outlet of Akerselva. Nobody would consider the islands nor Gamlebyen as being part of Bispevika. The administrative 'bydeler' have already been mapped, eg. Bydel Sagene: osm.org/relation/1279939#map=15/59.9343/10.7567

I've reverted most of your chagesets in Oslo. When I looked at them in more detail I saw that, regretfully, a lot of the changes you've done to the Oslo map over the last day or two can only be described as pure vandalism. One thing is that you've made a mess of the hierarchy. It's a lot worse that you've moved nodes that had been carefully placed in the correct spot In a few hours you destroyed a lt of hard work done by other mappers.

In case you don't speak Norwegian: Please stop what you're doing in Oslo. You're changing wikidata values so they point to different elements, you're moving the place nodes around and making a complete mess of the established hierarchy. osm.wiki/No:Map_Features#Places.2FSteder