Hi. Sorry, I wasn't clear what I was meaning should be merged. I meant these two relations osm.org/relation/9507742 osm.org/relation/12044315 are both called Ebnit and both have the two cliffs osm.org/way/685188147 osm.org/way/222117099 as members.

Hi James. Another time it might be better to split the service road in two, make them both drives by adding service=driveway and access=private. You could also add noexit=yes to the end nodes so someone else doesn't try and join them together again! I have looked at this place before but can't remember it and can't see it well from imagery so haven't done this.
Hope that helps
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/107452539

This looks like a really helpful edit James
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/108701043

Hi James. This looks like some good edits to me. Based on aerial imagery I have made some further changes https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=110252357 - let me know if they're not helpful. I also wondered if the join between the asphalt and cobblestones is further south? I haven't done this as I haven't surveyed it.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/108827005

Should this be merged with osm.org/relation/9507742 ?
Seems like the same to me

What happened to my comment!?
Add detailed footways and crossings around Oxford Road / Otley Road junction.

Hi Mike. Just spotted 3 more near Guiseley Wells.
http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/19wO
Hope that link works

Thanks. I've changed that bit and added some walls. osm.org/changeset/104379857#map=17/53.86463/-1.72542

Thanks for pointing that out, I'd forgotten about it. There isn't anything similar up at the road end is there. It's just one big opening

Hi Malcolm

Where you've added a footpath next to the farm track to Hollins Hill farm, usually that would just be joined to the track at either end and the designation added to the track. I'll fix this unless there's a reason for having it separate?

Okay, thanks. Yes, I remember it being up, I can't remember how I got up. I guess there must have been something or I probably wouldn't have marked it as a stile. But maybe it's now been removed. Cheers again for looking.

Thanks for checking. When you say a gap, do you mean a big gap or a squeezer (examples on osm.wiki/Tag:barrier%3Dstile#Stile_details )
I'll have to go back and take a look, I was too busy avoiding the cows last time for photos!

Oh good 🙂 Or maybe both exist and can be walked depending on the whim of the farmer?

Okay, no worries. I'll try and see if it's still there next time I'm out that way

👍 Footway is also what I use. You can also add informal=yes for desire lines and the like

I know, it's awkward seeing changes on OSM isn't it. It's osm.org/node/7771217026 but that doesn't help much!
If you have a look at https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=96432816 or https://osmhv.openstreetmap.de/changeset.jsp?id=96432816 and zoom into the footpath on the west of the Hollins Hill Road, the footpath used to cross a wall on the way to the bridleway.

I think what you've added is also there but when I walked that way was blocked by a temporary electric fence if I remember right, but there was a stile I went over.

In general, I think if you're going to change / delete something that's already on the map it's worth looking at whether it was just added by someone using Bing or from a 'survey', and how recent it was.

Thanks

Thanks Malcolm. Yeah, it's something I've struggled with and unfortunately there isn't a straightforward answer overall. However, in this case there is. If it's a pavement beside a road it should be highway=footway; footway=sidewalk (they use the American term because it has a specific meaning). I think it doesn't help that iD uses path and footpath.
My basic understanding is always footway where it's illegal to cycle. Some people like footway almost everywhere, some people like path for informal paths or like through a park. I think as long as we're consistent around here it doesn't matter much. Cheers!

Hi Malcolm
Is part of this unpaved? osm.org/way/896287178
Also, I think it and the one on the other side of Coppice Wood Avenue would be better tagged as highway=footway; footway=sidewalk.

Thanks

Hi Malcolm. The stile I added existed in July last year. Has it been removed?

Cheers :)