I've used MapWithAI too!

I've used MapWithAI too!

I've used MapWithAI too!

Sorry, changeset uploaded accidentally.
Comment should be:
Mapping landcover #UNGSC;#UniteMaps;#;#MINUSCA #East_Soungbe

Source: Bing

Sorry for the comment, it should be:
updating tracks #UNGSC;#UniteMaps;#;#UNSOS #Dusa_Mareb

Sorry for the comment, it should be:
updating tracks #UNGSC;#UniteMaps;#;#UNSOS #Dusa_Mareb

Hi Frans,
when I uploaded my changeset I got 1 conflict: I solved it and uploaded again.
If the other user had just saved his changeset, It could be possible that the difference between the 2 chagesets is just only 1 minute.

Hi Pascal,
why do you think I'm doing an import?
It's since several days I'm mapping in Mali around Gossi town, but
I'm mapping using only imageries.
Ciao!
Marco

Thank you for your advise, it was a mine (bad) mistake!
I usually map isolated dwelling using ctrl-V, probably I had in my clipboard that strange string (don't know how hell it's happened).
Already corrected, thank you again.

sorry, forgot to mention mapwith.ai among the sources

My apologies for landuse=military: it was my fault, I'm using it in Josm to distinguish the desertic ground, but in the last upload I forgot to erase this tag... :-(
We're discussing in the tagging ML about desertic soils, and also in a proposal page in the wiki: osm.wiki/Proposed_features/Ground

Hi Greg,
we're discussing about this in our team, and we hope to find a solution (obviously with the consent of the community).
So the tag natural=ground is "temporary", waiting for a better solution (it's also temporary in our wiki page [1]).
Maybe we can consider landcover tag too (sometimes landcover=bare_ground has been used).
But it has been objected that "ground" is too much generic (what is? sand, rock, earth...maybe landcover=bare_earth should be better).
We've to discuss about this in the tag mailing list.

[1] osm.wiki/Unite_Maps_Initiative/UN_Mappers/OSM_Features_in_Somalia

ricorda che nel commento devi dire cosa hai mappato, non come l'hai mappato

:-)

Ok. now I got it: "source" is on the stream, not the changeset!
Sorry, you are right: I never put the source tag on single items, I put it only at changeset level.
But I used Shift-R (in Josm) to tag this stream, having before selected the near stream (id 733424631), so the new stream has inherited tags from the near one :-(

Sorry, I don't see "survey" neither in my comment nor in the source of this changeset: in which field you read "survey"?
P.S. I fully agree with you that you must not write "survey" if you used only satellite imagery :-)