OpenStreetMapi logo OpenStreetMap

E-kirja ikoon Bluesky ikoon Facebooki ikoon LinkedIni ikoon Mastodoni ikoon Telegrami ikoon X-i ikoon

Arutelu

Kommentaar kasutajalt spiregrain 13. veebruar 2025, kell 12:15

For a school thats on a single site, the usual practice would be to add the buildings (building=school), playing fields, carparks, driveways and footpaths, then draw a single area around the whole site. That site area would have the name of the school, and all the other school-wide items (address, website url, etc).

You might need to use a multipolygon relation if there are two sites associated with the same school. Perhaps the same school has a main site and a set of playing fields nearby. Or maybe a multipolygon relation for one if the buildings, if it has an enclosed courtyard.

But in general, there’s no need for a relation. Even if there are multiple schools operated by the same organisation.

Normal School (no relations) : osm.org/way/454984390

Multi-site school (a relation) : osm.org/relation/10999945

School building mapped as a relation because it has an enclosed courtyard. But the surrounding school amenity is not a relation: osm.org/relation/6542927

kommenteerimiseks logi sisse