I use OSMUK Cadastral Parcels to describe property boundaries.
The rest is done by deduction and through my work as a courier.

I'm using house=terrace in common practice these days.
Did you get my update on Moulsecoomb North & South Hubs?
Best regards, Tone

Hi, I've not personally visited the site, however, it was at first an RAF base, later becoming a prison, and then a technical training centre for, I think, Saudi students. Since then it has been de-commissioned, and there is no access to the site. The Masjid was built for the Saudi students to worship there.

Great work once again. At this rate, between us local mappers, we will leave no stone unturned within East Brighton.

Hi,
When you make a changeset which spans hundreds of thousands of square kilometers, it alerts all mappers within that square to your changes, even though they may be hundreds of kilometers away.
Please confine each of your changesets to within one small area so that this does not happen.

Thanks again for following up and completing with post codes.

Thanks for that. I'll do the house numbers on Roundhill Crescent soon.

Thanks for the correction

What 'bad data' was that?

Thanks for the correction

Please keep your changesets to within one land continent.

A very wide area on this changeset

Thanks

Thanks mate. As you see I'm spending a little time with Muesli Mountain in 3D. I view it with Streets GL and F4map

A slip of the finger surely?

Thanks for pointing out my errors Matt.
The erroneous notes have now been removed.

Jez, would you be kind enough to exemplify a terrace so that I can see how it is supposed to be done?
I keep running into a "building within building" validation error.

The problem I have (putting 3D aside for the moment) with two or more building:part = yes contained in a building = yes is that I no longer see the house numbers in OSM.org

I've just watched that. I hope everybody sticks to the Urbex ethos.
I've done a bit more 3D work on the site this evening.