2012-12-05: v1:
osm.org/relation/2620918/history/1

According to its history, this relation osm.org/relation/2620918 already exists since 2012 as a type=multilingestring. I'm not sure either what its exact purpose is, so I did not explicitly change this relation's tags, nor change/add this type. The only reasons it shows up in this changeset is likely because some of its individual members (boundary ways) have been cut up to be able to add the correct sections to the newly created submunicipal boundary relations? If there is no added value/reason (anymore) for the multilinestring relation I *suppose* it could be deleted, but otherwise keep it as is?

Thanks for the valid remark. It was an unnecessary remnant of comparing datasets. The way has been deleted.

wijziging van enkele landelijke plaatsen, m.n. dorpen, van place=suburb, naar place=village, waar dit beter van toepassing lijkt (naar analogie met gebruikelijke tagschema van andere dorpen in Vlaanderen)

De oude relaties heb ik ondertussen verwijderd, alsook elders enkele arrondissementsgrenzen (relaties) verder aangepast.

Thanks for the remarks about the new parking scheme! I have changed the tags according to the actual situation; see:
osm.org/changeset/155851177
I.e.: parking allowed, except for Friday mornings (market hours). However JOSM gave a "wrong syntax" warning for the :conditional tags, though it is not clear why? Perhaps you could clarify?
Regards,
Vincent

Het is even geleden dat ik er geweest ben en op gelet heb, maar die AED hangt voor zover ik nog weet/wist binnen in de inkomzone/gang aan een muur rechts net na de lift.
Zie toevoeging:
osm.org/changeset/137453743