Hi! Your addition here has major problems with its tags. If you are the business owner, welcome to OSM! Please reply here or message me and we can get it fixed! If you are a marketing company creating accounts on behalf of clients, please review your process and learn more about OSM's tagging schema before making more edits. There's nothing wrong with adding businesses, but the way you're doing it is not helpful to anyone. (And likely does not improve SEO ranking.) For now, I've reverted your edit.

osm.org/changeset/149275186

Hi! Your addition here has major problems with its tags. If you are the business owner, welcome to OSM! Please reply here or message me and we can get it fixed! If you are a marketing company creating accounts on behalf of clients, please review your process and learn more about OSM's tagging schema before making more edits. There's nothing wrong with adding businesses, but the way you're doing it is not helpful to anyone. (And likely does not improve SEO ranking.) For now, I've reverted your edit.

osm.org/changeset/149275186

Hi! Your addition here has major problems with its tags. If you are the business owner, welcome to OSM! Please reply here or message me and we can get it fixed! If you are a marketing company creating accounts on behalf of clients, please review your process and learn more about OSM's tagging schema before making more edits. There's nothing wrong with adding businesses, but the way you're doing it is not helpful to anyone. (And likely does not improve SEO ranking.) For now, I've reverted your edit.

osm.org/changeset/149275186

Wow, this is a really tricky intersection! I looked over it and see no problems. (At first I thought I had a better way, got halfway through trying it, and changed my mind, haha). The only minor issue is that someone turning right off of Parker Rd will have to do a crazy backwards-right-turn according to the map. But as I understand it, most routing software will look at the overall shape (and roads nearby) to figure out what's really going on. Anyway maybe another more experienced mapper can chime in if they have a better way to do this!
Also nice job on the lane tags. :)

Hi, and welcome to OpenStreetMap! Since you requested a review, I looked over your changes here. Looks great overall! I see that you removed a bridge area feature (north end of Venture Parkway) - Was that intentional?

Thanks for your contributions!

Hi, and welcome to OpenStreetMap! Since you requested a review, I looked over your changes here. Everything seems great to me, thanks for your contributions!

Howdy! Since you requested a review, I looked over your changes here. Everything looks great here, thanks for your contributions!

Hi, and welcome to OpenStreetMap! Since you requested a review, I looked over your changes here. Looks great! The tags you ended up on (addr only) are perfect for this situation. Thanks for your contributions!

Hi, and welcome to OpenStreetMap! Since you requested a review, I looked over your changes here. Looks great over all! Here are a couple of suggestions/issues.
- The name tag is only for the common or official name of something, and shouldn't be used to describe a feature. In this case, the fact that this is a pavilion structure should be represented by other tags.
- Looks like you set layer=-1 to get rid of the warning about it crossing the foot path. Since it's a roof structure that goes over, it should be layer=1.
Overall, I suggest the following tags for this:

amenity=shelter
building=roof
shelter_type=picnic_shelter
layer=1

Let me know if you have any questions, and thanks for your contribution!

Sorry, got a little carried away with this one! Haha

Hello again! Looking over this changeset, there is an issue - you've moved the corner of this "open space" feature to overlap with some houses. Do you mind fixing that? Let me know if you have any questions. Thanks!

Howdy! Since you requested a review, I looked over your changes here. Looks great to me, no issues! One tip is that when mapping a rectangular feature, you can select it and hit "Q" to square up the corners. That tends to make things look a little neater.
Thanks for your contributions, and welcome to OSM!

Oh, and - One tip is that when mapping a rectangular feature, you can select it and press "Q" to automatically square up the corners. That tends to make things somewhat nicer aesthetically. :)

Hi there! Since you requested a review, I looked over your change here. Looks great to me! Thanks for your contribution, and welcome to OSM.

Hi, and welcome to OpenStreetMap! Since you requested a review, I looked over your addition here. No problems, everything seems great! Thanks for your contribution.

Hi, and welcome to OpenStreetMap! Since you requested a review, I looked over your change here. Things are looking great overall! Here's a suggestion, though. Sometimes, the "main" feature for a business is the outer boundary of the business. That's the case here. When it's like that, it's generally best to keep the building outlines fairly generically tagged, then add all the business details to the larger, main feature. That way things aren't duplicated. I went ahead and fixed that in this case.
Let me know if you have any questions, and thanks for your contribution!

Regarding your changes in this area, everything looks great! Man, the geometry of the roads around here is particularly bad, huh. Many of these were imported from a government database called TIGER a long time ago. Much of it, such as around here, hasn't been reviewed or cleaned up.

Anyway, no problems with your additions here, so thanks. :)

Hi, and welcome to OpenStreetMap! Since you requested a review, I looked over this and your other recent changesets. In this case, you can see that the bounding box (rectangle that encloses all the things you changed) spans the country. Huge bboxes make it really hard for others to review your work, so we should generally save changes made in one local area before moving on elsewhere. Let me know if you have any questions, and thanks for your contributions!

Howdy! Since you requested a review, I looked over your change here. Looks great to me overall! One minor improvement I see is that instead of leisure=park, we can be more specific by putting leisure=pitch and sport=skateboard. I went ahead and switched that over.
Let me know if you have any questions or objections, and thanks for your contributions! Local knowledge is a super valuable resource.

Hi, and welcome to OpenStreetMap! Since you requested a review, I looked over your changes here. Everything seems great to me! Thanks for your contributions.