OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
149247060 over 1 year ago

Oh, I forgot to mention - One suggestion is that the changeset comment should be used to describe what changes you made. (The justification is fine to have in addition, but the primary reason is to summarize what you changed.)

149247060 over 1 year ago

Hi, and welcome to OpenStreetMap! Since you requested a review, I looked over your recent changes. Looks great! I don't see any issues. Thanks for your contributions!

149271929 over 1 year ago

Howdy! Since you requested a review, I looked over your changes here. Looks great overall! Probably intentional, but I just wanted to make sure it was intentional that you tagged an advisory speed limit (usually orange signs for curves, exits, etc) on the on/off ramps.
Also, looks like you (probably accidentally) moved a parking lot feature from a church lot to a neighborhood. I went ahead and fixed that.
Thanks for your contributions!

149206725 over 1 year ago

Hi! Your addition here has major problems with its tags. If you are the business owner, welcome to OSM! Please reply here or message me and we can get it fixed! If you are a marketing company creating accounts on behalf of clients, please review your process and learn more about OSM's tagging schema before making more edits. There's nothing wrong with adding businesses, but the way you're doing it is not helpful to anyone. (And likely does not improve SEO ranking.) For now, I've reverted your edit.

osm.org/changeset/149275186

149204906 over 1 year ago

Hi! Your addition here has major problems with its tags. If you are the business owner, welcome to OSM! Please reply here or message me and we can get it fixed! If you are a marketing company creating accounts on behalf of clients, please review your process and learn more about OSM's tagging schema before making more edits. There's nothing wrong with adding businesses, but the way you're doing it is not helpful to anyone. (And likely does not improve SEO ranking.) For now, I've reverted your edit.

osm.org/changeset/149275186

149203016 over 1 year ago

Hi! Your addition here has major problems with its tags. If you are the business owner, welcome to OSM! Please reply here or message me and we can get it fixed! If you are a marketing company creating accounts on behalf of clients, please review your process and learn more about OSM's tagging schema before making more edits. There's nothing wrong with adding businesses, but the way you're doing it is not helpful to anyone. (And likely does not improve SEO ranking.) For now, I've reverted your edit.

osm.org/changeset/149275186

149201757 over 1 year ago

Hi! Your addition here has major problems with its tags. If you are the business owner, welcome to OSM! Please reply here or message me and we can get it fixed! If you are a marketing company creating accounts on behalf of clients, please review your process and learn more about OSM's tagging schema before making more edits. There's nothing wrong with adding businesses, but the way you're doing it is not helpful to anyone. (And likely does not improve SEO ranking.) For now, I've reverted your edit.

osm.org/changeset/149275186

149180859 over 1 year ago

Hi! Your addition here has major problems with its tags. If you are the business owner, welcome to OSM! Please reply here or message me and we can get it fixed! If you are a marketing company creating accounts on behalf of clients, please review your process and learn more about OSM's tagging schema before making more edits. There's nothing wrong with adding businesses, but the way you're doing it is not helpful to anyone. (And likely does not improve SEO ranking.) For now, I've reverted your edit.

osm.org/changeset/149275186

149096058 over 1 year ago

Wow, this is a really tricky intersection! I looked over it and see no problems. (At first I thought I had a better way, got halfway through trying it, and changed my mind, haha). The only minor issue is that someone turning right off of Parker Rd will have to do a crazy backwards-right-turn according to the map. But as I understand it, most routing software will look at the overall shape (and roads nearby) to figure out what's really going on. Anyway maybe another more experienced mapper can chime in if they have a better way to do this!
Also nice job on the lane tags. :)

149197842 over 1 year ago

Hi, and welcome to OpenStreetMap! Since you requested a review, I looked over your changes here. Looks great overall! I see that you removed a bridge area feature (north end of Venture Parkway) - Was that intentional?

Thanks for your contributions!

149199258 over 1 year ago

Hi, and welcome to OpenStreetMap! Since you requested a review, I looked over your changes here. Everything seems great to me, thanks for your contributions!

149205391 over 1 year ago

Howdy! Since you requested a review, I looked over your changes here. Everything looks great here, thanks for your contributions!

149205512 over 1 year ago

Hi, and welcome to OpenStreetMap! Since you requested a review, I looked over your changes here. Looks great! The tags you ended up on (addr only) are perfect for this situation. Thanks for your contributions!

149214064 over 1 year ago

Hi, and welcome to OpenStreetMap! Since you requested a review, I looked over your changes here. Looks great over all! Here are a couple of suggestions/issues.
- The name tag is only for the common or official name of something, and shouldn't be used to describe a feature. In this case, the fact that this is a pavilion structure should be represented by other tags.
- Looks like you set layer=-1 to get rid of the warning about it crossing the foot path. Since it's a roof structure that goes over, it should be layer=1.
Overall, I suggest the following tags for this:

amenity=shelter
building=roof
shelter_type=picnic_shelter
layer=1

Let me know if you have any questions, and thanks for your contribution!

149188580 over 1 year ago

Sorry, got a little carried away with this one! Haha

149142310 over 1 year ago

Hello again! Looking over this changeset, there is an issue - you've moved the corner of this "open space" feature to overlap with some houses. Do you mind fixing that? Let me know if you have any questions. Thanks!

149142528 over 1 year ago

Howdy! Since you requested a review, I looked over your changes here. Looks great to me, no issues! One tip is that when mapping a rectangular feature, you can select it and hit "Q" to square up the corners. That tends to make things look a little neater.
Thanks for your contributions, and welcome to OSM!

149142687 over 1 year ago

Oh, and - One tip is that when mapping a rectangular feature, you can select it and press "Q" to automatically square up the corners. That tends to make things somewhat nicer aesthetically. :)

149142687 over 1 year ago

Hi there! Since you requested a review, I looked over your change here. Looks great to me! Thanks for your contribution, and welcome to OSM.

149142693 over 1 year ago

Hi, and welcome to OpenStreetMap! Since you requested a review, I looked over your addition here. No problems, everything seems great! Thanks for your contribution.