OpenStreetMap 로고 OpenStreetMap

Road Curve Mapping Tips

Xvtn님이 English로 2023년 5월 24일에 게시함.

Don’t Overdo It

Use as few nodes as possible, but as many as necessary. This makes it much easier for later mappers to improve or update things.

Fidelity

Keep Consistent Distance Between Nodes

Makes rendered maps look much nicer :)

Consistent

Follow Road’s Centerline

Center it

Do you disagree? Any other tips? Leave a comment.

이메일 아이콘 Bluesky 아이콘 Facebook 아이콘 LinkedIn 아이콘 마스토돈 아이콘 텔레그램 아이콘 X 아이콘

토론

2023년 5월 25일 16:59nickjohnston님의 의견

I broadly agree, but would like to point out that for those willing to use JOSM, UtilsPlugin2 provides the very useful Circle Arc tool. I use it a lot.

I like iD. Without it I most likely would have never started editing OpenStreetMap. But I advise people to learn JOSM. The investment will soon pay back.

2023년 5월 25일 17:15Xvtn님의 의견

Great tip! It seems there’s a JOSM plugin for everything. Obviously it’s the more powerful option for editing, but after trying to get used to it several times I can’t seem to get over that initial wall of unfamiliarity. I suppose one of these days I should make myself switch over and reap some of the benefits you describe…

2023년 5월 26일 09:40philippec님의 의견

If you have an official map, maybe the official centerline is the best.

2023년 5월 29일 09:44Exe19님의 의견

I’d add a sub-point to “Keep Consistent Distance Between Nodes”: node spacing should be proportional to curvature:

  • If the curve is tight segments should be shorter,
  • if it’s gentle they should be longer and
  • if the segment is straight as laser beam then it should have no intermediate nodes unless something else requires it

That way the angular spacing is more consistent and we use nodes where they are the most useful.

2023년 5월 29일 09:47philippec님의 의견

I hate when the map in my region has a childish look.

2023년 6월 27일 04:00Rovastar님의 의견

I completely disagree with the don’t overdo it.

Go as detailed as possible in general let’s say a meter or so max level (dependant on the curvature) the example you gave as ‘too detailed’ I think is fine. Your ‘perfect one’ was IMHO terrible and needs at least double the amount of points.

Your reasoning for not adding more points is that someone may need to update in the future. My question is why? The road in question will likely stay that way for decades and a really well mapped curve will not need any changes made to it for all that time. What are they going to update? If the road changes significantly then the whole thing will need to be remapped anyway.

I say with time permitting map it as detailed as you can. The result will be there for a long time.

(I have other issues with that curve too it is to far aligned to one side it should be in the middle of the road and the connecting road should be more curved to reflect what the road….but I digress)

2024년 1월 22일 10:04Mateusz Konieczny님의 의견

If you have an official map, maybe the official centerline is the best.

no, we are mapping reality

if reality and official map diverges, then we should ignore official map

if they match then we can just follow reality

댓글을 남기려면 로그인하세요