Please do not glue together things on different layers. You glued the I-990 bridge to Ellicott Creek Trailway.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/115544744

Hi,

This is definitely an improvement, but the correct tag (or at least the tag that is vastly more common) is just leisure=swimming_pool (no water tag).
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119175343

highway=construction is meant for things that are currently being worked on by a construction team. If it's just closed, and not being worked on, other tags would be more appropriate.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/118279536

Good changeset, but it looks like you left the `building:flats` tag on the exterior way. This is duplicate now that it's on the relation.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/118283224

Disregard my previous comment; it was an issue with a library iD uses, which I have now submitted a fix for.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119093331

https://github.com/osmlab/name-suggestion-index/pull/6390

Fixed in osm.org/changeset/119140030

That's certainly an issue. Not too familiar with iD these days, but I'll look into this.

Something fishy seems to be happening with this; I've seen several mappers all make this change.

Why did you change `operator` to `Worchester County` on osm.org/relation/10039511 ?

Hi,

Looks like you placed two nodes on top of each other. Try to make sure that you're not duplicating like this in the future.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/118650404

Hi,

This changeset looks okay, except for the fact that you changed the operator of some of the Bee-Line bus routes to "Worchester County", which doesn't exist. Looks like you might have been copying from another mapper who was incorrect, let me know if that's the case.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119093331

Hi,

Looks like you deleted a driveway that's still visible from satellite imagery. Are you sure it doesn't exist anymore?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/118868234

How do you know that the surface of the bridge is concrete?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116450444

Thanks for cleaning up. The value you put in name might be better in official_name, though.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117747272

Hi, welcome to OSM!

Are you sure this is a house? It's pretty small in comparison to the other main building on the property.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117787626

Hi, you created a bad route relation in this changeset. Please take a look at osm.org/relation/11497509 and correct it as needed. Thanks

Just letting you know, you somehow created a new relation for I-865 in this changeset that only had one node in it. I'm deleting it now.

Overall looks good, just a couple things I wanted to point out.

First of all, I'd recommend using the "NYSDOP Orthoimagery - Latest" imagery source when editing in the state. It's the most consistent imagery source, although some other sources (Mapbox, Bing) can have higher resolution in some places. I've seen imagery glitches in both Bing and Mapbox in some places, so I tend to only use them if I need higher resolution in certain places. Even then, I offset those sources to match the NYS imagery.

Also, if some paths through parking lots are a sort of "main" path (even if there are parking spaces on both sides), you can omit the parking aisle tag, which conveys their significance. It will stand out on the map and be preferable to nagivation apps.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/118926688

Hi,

Where are you getting this address information? This is Amherst, not Buffalo.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/118782008