The road is within the parcel boundaries of private property.

Slack discussion also at https://osmus.slack.com/archives/CCJ2P6KCH/p1701209510983289

This is private property as listed in the city of Newport GIS. It is posted "NO TRESPASSING".
Please do not change this road back. I am not familiar with "Axios GIS" but if it's an OdBL-compatible data source, please document it here:
osm.wiki/Rhode_Island

Link below to City of Newport's official GIS site:
https://newportri.mapgeo.io/datasets/property?abuttersDistance=200&latlng=41.479467%2C-71.298528&previewId=5907&zoom=18

I reverted this change because these streets are posted as private access roads. Please do not change them back without community discussion. Ref/ DWG ticket #2023112810000241

osm.org/changeset/144581288

I reverted this change because these streets are posted as private access roads. Please do not change them back without community discussion. Ref/ DWG ticket #2023112810000241

osm.org/changeset/144581288

I reverted this change because these streets are posted as private access roads. Please do not change them back without community discussion. Ref/ DWG ticket #2023112810000241

osm.org/changeset/144581288

I reverted this change because these streets are posted as private access roads. Please do not change them back without community discussion. Ref/ DWG ticket #2023112810000241

osm.org/changeset/144581288

I've started a thread specifically discussing this change here:
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/recent-alaska-place-reclassification/106499

Hi, I noticed that you changed the classification of a number of places in Alaska. Was this the result of a discussion or some other documentation?

The topic of US place= values is being discussed here:
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/new-england-place-name-inflation

It's clearly marked as private. There's nothing permissive about this road.

Note that a number of new gates and fences have gone up over the past year in this area.

I can go survey it tomorrow and take an updated photograph if you'd like to see it.

There is a gate on Cliff with a no trespassing sign at this location:
osm.org/node/11186999734#map=19/41.48193/-71.29910

Path is incorrect for a road that cars drive on. This should either be highway=track or highway=service as it's access to the parking lot to the south.

I've reverted this change. access=permissive is wrong for roads in a fenced-off condemned area. Please do not change this tag unless this area is re-surveyed.

I've reverted this change. access=permissive is wrong for roads in a fenced-off condemned area. Please do not change this tag unless this area is re-surveyed.

Hi,

For edits like this, try using the EveryDoor app!

Also, please use descriptive comments. "Updated based on actual road" does not say anything. If you surveyed it (personally saw it with your eyes) please say so, otherwise describe why you're making the change.

Hi,

1. Please do not change private gated roads to access=permissive. A gated road is clearly private.
2. Please do not change private roads to highway=track. highway=track is intended for land access roads, not for residential roads for access to houses.

Intended CS description was "updated foot paths and surface attributes.

JOSM somehow uploaded my changeset on me prematurely.