Athugasemdir frá ZeLonewolf
Breytingasett | Þegar | Athugasemd |
---|---|---|
96122941 | fyrir 7 dögum síðan | Yes, by all means! |
168466685 | fyrir 19 dögum síðan | You created version 1 of that relation... |
168466685 | fyrir 20 dögum síðan | Are you sure about County Road 25 1/2 in Weld Co, CO? I can't find any evidence of this existing. There is a nearby county ROAD with this number on a different alignment. |
159828124 | fyrir 21 dögum síðan | Unfortunately there is no way to read the minds of users that take it upon themselves to conduct undiscussed imports that are at odds with community consensus. That is the reason for the import guidelines and the Automated Edits Code of Conduct. Unfortunately, discussing things with the OSM community is more work than simply unilaterally uploading data. I totally understand if discussing imports in advance is too much of a burden and this causes you not to conduct future imports. Such is the nature of collaboration. |
167515020 | fyrir 26 dögum síðan | Hey Joe, can you jump on the discussion at https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/admin-level-for-michigan-wisconsin-minnesota-and-north-dakota/131136 ? |
167422895 | fyrir um 1 mánuði síðan | Ahh snap. If it's easier, we can do a revert and do.over |
140089937 | fyrir um 1 mánuði síðan | This change was reverted due to the presence of a posted no trespassing sign. |
166324015 | fyrir um 1 mánuði síðan | Please join the discussion on these edits at https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/religious-administration-boundaries-in-the-united-states/131400 |
158990316 | fyrir um 1 mánuði síðan | Unfortunately the bounding box treatment on undeleting nodes is not ideal |
167356853 | fyrir um 2 mánuðum síðan | Oh huh, for that case, name:right and name:left are supposed to indicate what the name is on each side (relative to the direction of the way). Which of course, is also a colossal pain to do. Semi-colon delimiters in name tags throw a warning in JOSM because you're supposed to use the various ???_name tag variants to store alternate names. So I guess I'm not sure what properly belongs in the main name tag in this case, but :right and :left should be the proper way to do it. See osm.wiki/Key:name:left Some data consumers can handle the semi-colon just fine:
Some data consumers (notable the standard tile layer cannot:
So this might be a good broader question to ask. I would be fine with putting back the semi-colons but I expect it will come up again because of the validator warnings. |
50420007 | fyrir um 2 mánuðum síðan | At the moment, the Cody relation doesn't even have a name tag, which is why it came up on my list. |
167158443 | fyrir um 2 mánuðum síðan | I haven't gone past the sign, but I think you could make an argument for either. It has attributes of either type. It's really narrow and looks like it goes to only one house. I'm not sure the distinction matters too much. |
167158443 | fyrir um 2 mánuðum síðan | Hi Nick. Yes, there is a no trespassing sign, at least, on the Fishing Cove Road side. No, it is not a new sign. It was there when I surveyed it a year ago, and it was there a half hour ago when I went to check. Here is the photo I took of it:
It was late in the day, so I apologize for the lighting. It is geo-tagged so you can see the exact location. Given how prominent this sign is, I'm surprised you didn't notice it in your survey. |
50420007 | fyrir um 2 mánuðum síðan | Thanks for a good laugh, 8 years later... |
165443528 | fyrir um 2 mánuðum síðan | This edit is being discussed here:
Please join the discussion. |
86589334 | fyrir 3 mánuðum síðan | Hi aduxas. I mapped what I hiked back in 2020, but that was five years ago! My GPS data is here:
We attempted to follow the trail as best we could as it was marked on the ground at the time. However, the trail alignment has changed at times over the years, so I would not surprise me if it's different now. RIGIS also has a trail layer here:
It looks like it is indeed showing a more northerly route along the pond. So if you've hiked this section and followed the signs, then by all means make the corrections! |
159938084 | fyrir 4 mánuðum síðan | I think that needs a community discussion that's worth opening a thread. There's several folks I can think of off the top of my head that ought to weigh in. Sub-municipal boundaries can be a controversial topic and I don't think there's a strong community consensus. Therefore I don't feel qualified to state a recommendation unilaterally! |
159938084 | fyrir 4 mánuðum síðan | The geometries were broken in various ways. Not in boundary relations, not connected to adjoining boundaries, and so forth. They are also not listed in Virginia's entry on osm.wiki/United_States_admin_level which suggests no community discussion occurred to add an admin level above 8. For these reasons I deemed them too broken to fix and deleted them. |
162028704 | fyrir 5 mánuðum síðan | Should be change to boundary=statistical + border_type=census_designated_place. This was after I curated the CDP list to match the census bureau. |
160228441 | fyrir 6 mánuðum síðan | Thank you! |