OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
37500504 over 9 years ago

A further note that using barrier=gate on ways is discouraged, and using it on nodes is strongly preferred

37500504 over 9 years ago

Hello, thank you for your edit.
Please ensure when you apply tags like barrier=gate you also apply a barrier=gate node at the centre as barrier=gate is often a useless tag when applied to a way.

Also note the map scale as your barrier=gate was grossly oversized (approx 40m wide before update)
See image: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/29846412/barriergate.png

Thanks :)

35626261 over 9 years ago

Hi Robbie, this is a friendly note on editing in OpenStreetMap.
This edit you completed three months ago left redundant tags and deleted important ways(!) As a result you made this intersection not able to be navigable. Only now three months later am I correcting this edit (by chance) some edits don't get corrected or stay in an errorsome state for years - that is for three months no one could use this intersection if they used a navigation app. Please be very careful of your edits and their practical implications. Be sure not to delete important roads or tags and make edits without really knowing what you are doing, or rushing through an edit. Thank you :) Kind Regards, Aaron

35220103 over 9 years ago

Hello :) Just a friendly note that best practice for highway=construction tagging is to not overwrite the prexisting value, and instead have highway=construction and construction=* where the construction tag is the highway value.

35247625 over 9 years ago

Changeset Redacted
Abusive/Spam Changeset

33524213 almost 10 years ago

Changeset partially reverted. Incorrect road classification. Check classification before edit.

33498579 almost 10 years ago

Hi epicsauce :)
There appears to be a link at
http://gatewaywa.com.au/assets/Publications/Factsheets/FACTSHEET-4-Tonkin-Dunreath.pdf
In the visualisation it appears to be covered by a red material. In aerial photographs this appears to be under construction. But it probably wouldn't be used by regular traffic, after construction it may be mapped as a service road or something similar. Good find :)

33349669 almost 10 years ago

Changeset reverted

33349669 almost 10 years ago

Further to this to be-aware of the correct tagging (i.e when to use motorway, and when instead to use motorway_link), and when to merge road ways, and road classes. Nonetheless your edit is very much appreciated and contributes to the a great map

33349669 almost 10 years ago

Hi epicsauce,

Thanks for your edit :)

When editing be mindful of the tags on the object, in particular, to correct any fixme=* tags and in this case to remove any redundant tags, notably highway=construction before changing the road (highway=* tag). Unless someone reviews the road, which quite often may not be for months or years, that redundant tag will remain and cause issues with end-users, such as navigation apps, which may not allow routing over a highway=construction road way.

Thanks :) :)

33348144 almost 10 years ago

Further to this to be-aware of the correct tagging (i.e when to use motorway, and when instead to use motorway_link), and when to merge road ways, and road classes. Nonetheless your edit is very much appreciated and contributes to the a great map

33348144 almost 10 years ago

Hi epicsauce,

Thanks for your edit :)

When editing be mindful of the tags on the object, in particular, to correct any fixme=* tags and in this case to remove any redundant tags, notably highway=construction before changing the road (highway=* tag). Unless someone reviews the road, which quite often may not be for months or years, that redundant tag will remain and cause issues with end-users, such as navigation apps, which may not allow routing over a highway=construction road way.

Thanks :) :)

32697530 about 10 years ago

(Sorry - correction the key disused:*=* for highway or similar features with the exclusion of railways.)

32697530 about 10 years ago

Hi there :)
The key disused:*=* is discouraged, not rendered in Mapnik, nor supported widely.
Rather the key access=* should be applied, the feature deleted, or highway class (highway=*) altered (or a combination of these).

Thanks for editing, your contributions in Perth are great :)

28545593 over 10 years ago

Hi pnorman :)

I appreciate your comment and was wanting to test the rendering of residential_link and link road capping. This changeset has been redacted @ osm.org/changeset/28581542

28230626 over 10 years ago

I tried having a look at the transport operators website but their maps are crude. The trouble is I don't know if the bus is one way or if it terminates or is a loop etc.

28230626 over 10 years ago

Hi SomeoneElse, I'm not familiar with the area (And by chance spotted this roundabout, used iD and the make circular option on a few different roundabouts in the area). What other relations do you mean?

There appears to be issues with:
(540564) osm.org/relation/2416702#map=19/53.12580/-1.26381
&
(Rainbow 3C) osm.org/relation/540564#map=19/53.12590/-1.26319

28230626 over 10 years ago

Noted and corrected @ osm.org/changeset/28250039

Thanks :)

28211847 over 10 years ago

Changeset Redacted due to overlapping ways altering display of water not rendered in some mapping applications and thus hiding any data it lies over. Please use changeset comments field.

19264718 over 10 years ago

Edit reverted. This is a friendly request that if you chose to edit in the future you consider the integrity of the map data. Make a website, use Facebook friends or other means to spread your website, not abusing community driven map content :)