oh my god im so sorry, that was the wrong link. i meant to send this one

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2UJ_a7mxGpM

live armando reaction

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j5a0W0UqIPk

its fine to have a changeset this large for massive tag changes and tbh if youre as stupid as you would need to be to think that queer should include non queer people, none of your opinions matter. also plenty of queer people are straight, which is a degree of basic nuance you're clearly incapable of Armando.

yeah bestie im just gonna be blunt and honest with you, if you keep going down this path and with this attitude, you're just gonna get blocked from editing by the data working group and have all your edits reverted anyway. like there are thousands of people who have done the same as you and all get the same outcome. plus most of the time the people who do this get a ton of community attention and get their property micromapped purely from spite of dealing with them.

deleting things because theyre on private property isn't how this is dealt with. access=private is what people use. this is something thoroughly well laid out, you're not the first person to do this and certainly wont be the last. if you want to read more. if you want to read more about why here's a good wiki link osm.wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property

its perfectly acceptable to have large changeset sizes if its reasonable. doing a brief look over of babis b's changes it seems reasonable to just revert them. thats absolutely a good enough reason to have a world spanning changeset.

Yeah I was thinking it could be tertiary too. Before it was a residential road and the western part of Crittenden Road is also residential (and been that way for years), so I thought it was better to trust it and retag it to residential.

Hi, feel I should step in and clarify this isn't a mechanical edit, it was all manual. This was stated in the other changeset.

apologies for the changeset size, i clicked the button to upload each change individually in josm, but i clearly messed it up somehow

No response and cant find anything about it online, so id say its safe to just remove.

Hey, what is the reason why you added some of these abandoned railways? Some of them dont seem like theres anything left, just going through empty farmland. If its completely gone its better served on openhistoricalmap, which actually got some new rail features recently.

Hey, hope you're having a good day, why did you delete the driveways 1210204974 and 756845436 in this changeset?

Yeah something being on privilate property does not mean it should be deleted. Just put access=private. Here's a wiki page with more info osm.wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property

Oh thank you for finding that! It's a little embarrassing that I managed to miss that but thanks for checking it, I'll try to be more vigilant next time.

Why did you delete this path? it seems to still exist

Hi, just so you know we don't delete data just because its private, instead using tags like acess=private.

If you want to read more on it, heres a wiki link: osm.wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property

osm.org/changeset/147237492

ive gotten around to it and its now been moved

thank you! although i think ive now reached the limit of what i can do with aerial imagery so if you have anything better feel free to add more.

I meant to type misphrased not misplaced but apparently my phone hates that.

Sorry if i misplaced, but the tag in question "waterway=restricted" is completely undocumented and makes no sense, and the other tags were basic location tags so I assumed it was just a made up thing and deleted it. If you know if it actually was anything real please feel free revert it and fix it.