note to self, josm does not handle emojis in the changeset comment field

Gouda 🧀

FYI you added building=yes to the national park osm.org/relation/5748204 in this changeset, I've already removed it

Hi, by chance do you remember what the man_made=fender around osm.org/way/733749978 are for?

Hi! please dont add in fake stuff for pokemon go. I've reverted these two edits

osm.org/changeset/151789647

Yeah that happens, if you press g I think it'll highlight the changes you've made but it also previews everything that's been modified after you click save in the top right (though that's only really useful here if it's a small changeset)

why did you remove the highway tag for hamlin avenue north? I've already put it back

did all of them in osm.org/changeset/151171941

this broke highway 25s route relation, ill fix it

Removed all the names in this one blob, not sure if there are any else

natural=beach is only used for geological formations on the coast of some body of water, so please don't add it to baseball fields and playgrounds

please dont change bodies of water to be beaches and add in fake beaches. also names should be real names and not descriptions.

I hope you're day's going well

The community has not decided that worldwide changesets are banned, let alone ones that are only several continents.

I meant no longer whats currently on the map, sorry.

If there's literally nothing there anymore it should be deleted from the database. Removing things that no longer exist does make the map better. If someone is too lazy to check what's deleted that's entirely on them for choosing to not do qa work that's all on them, no one should work around that.

If its not actually a school anymore then why go out of your way to preserve it? The map shouldn't be made worse just so local mappers can find obvious errors easier. Having no data is much better than bunk data, someone can also see there's nothing there on the map and go look for it. Local mappers can look and see that this changeset goes over their community and use QA tools like https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=149843868#7/31.445/-95.397 to see if it actually impacted them.

No, strongly disagree. Reverting this was a terrible decision. Also how is that example surely wrong? I don't see what's wrong with it.

There is no consensus to the idea that all large changeset bboxes are bad and should not be allowed. It even says there's no consensus on optimal bbox size, just that ideally changesets are local and not super big. In practice, world spanning changesets are normal and I don't know why people are now objecting to these two.

I would infinitely rather look at one large changeset when reviewing than track down every single local changeset someone makes. Trying to force an interpretation of non-binding guidelines with no consensus to it because of osmcha's limitations doesn't really make sense either.

I dont think its wrong to stop landuse at the curb, it makes the most sense to me to have whats between the roads as a distinct landuse block. I don't have anything against stopping at sidewalks I just think curbs is easier and simpler.