Hi, what is your source for the reclassifiation of the roads? Where did you get those roads are 'tertiary' in the Slovak road system?

Sorry, I don't know where that bus stop is. I only visited the main bus station to check where the city buses stop. I'm going to fix them again :)

Super, dakujem.

Dobry den, ten usek cesty 3369 od Stanicnej ulice po zeleznicnu stanicu preco nie je cestou tretej triedy? Len preto, ze ma panely? Ale je to snad stale hlavna pristupova cesta k stanici, kade maju jazdit vsetky auta? A nie polna cesta, kam bezne auta nesmu ist. Takze highway=track sa mi nezda spravne.

Hi, what does the "Košice - TKD Dobrá" railway line represent? It has no railway number and there is already a very similar properly mapped railway (a set of tracks) relation called "Košice – Čierna nad Tisou (– Čop)". That one is only one station (a few meters) longer than yours. So what is your relation for? If you wanted to draw a train route (a train service operating along these railway tracks), that is done in a completely different way with route=train relation.

Vsetko som to opravil.

Dobry den, funkcie budov sa nepisu len takto po slovensky do nazvu budovy, to nikomu nepomoze. Treba pozivat riadne znacky pre objekty podla osm.wiki/, napr. hasicska stanica je amenity=fire_station, obecny urad je amenity=townhall. Potom tomu budu rozumiet aj cudzinci a hlavne aplikacie.

Zdravim, preco ste su poposuvali par domov v centre Gerlachova a aj cestu o 10 metrov? Ved to teraz na nic nesedi. Vratim to vsetko spat.

Zdravim, prosim nabuduce uvedte aj nejaky zdroj udajov. Momentalne Vasa sada zmien uvadza len ze ste pouzili Bing, ale tam ta cesta urcite nie je.

Ak je cesta este len vo vystavbe, treba pouzit highway=construction, aby nevyzerala na mape ako funkcna pristupna cesta. Ak sa Vam javi, ze uz je fyzicky hotova, ale este neotvorena, tak tam treba dat aspon access=no, ze tam bezna premavka nema pristup.

Okrem toho, ak ste zakreslili novu cestu III. triedy, ake ma cislo?
Dakujem

Znovu, aky bol zmysel odstranenia planovanej cesty R4?

Dobry den, preco ste tu odstranili planovanu trasu rychlostnej cesty R1? Co na nej bolo zle?

Ah OK :) So can I put the buses back to stop at Autobusová stanica - Autóbusz-pályaudvar at node 6831656809 where I have seen them to depart? It was a lot of work to update them, but I can do it again.

Thanks for updating the bus routes in Komarno when they change. I have also added the bus stop Dohany-utca and it seems now you have moved it to the proper location. Thanks.

Hi, why did you put back the buses 2 and 3 in Komarno to stop at node 3314624989? I have visited the bus station recently and seen they stop at node 6831656809? I intentionally changed all the routes to stop there.
I didn't change bus 228 as I do not know where that one stops.

Hi, the railway station in Komarom was tagged correctly, the change on node node 91686917 from public_transport=stop_position to =station was incorrect. Please see
osm.wiki/Railway_stations .

I see that wall separating the 2 different structures. But that does not mean they are 2 separate buildings. There is NO such rule in OSM to split buildings on shape/level-count change. If you want to model 3D shape of the building, please learn osm.wiki/Simple_3D_buildings. I did that modelling correctly using building:part=* on the building 6378.

You can't leave it, can you? I tell you not to do it and you again destroyed all the buildings using imprecise bing images. We have much more higher-resolution images for Slovakia and also cadastral map is much more precise. There was no need to touch those buildings again using Bing.

It is you who artificially divided buildings now (for the 2A address).

Your new changeset osm.org/changeset/75022041 is completely useless and damaging and will be reverted.

Hi, what "redundant markers" for bus stop Povazska do you mean? a bus stop can be represented with a node with public_transport=stop_position and another one with public_transport=platform (where people wait). Also the role 'bus_stop' for this stop in the relation of bus 6 that you added is invalid. So you actually destroyed this stop for bus line 6... Please be more careful when touching objects inside relations. Thanks.

Dobry den, zda sa mi, ze tento experiment nemal velmi uspech u ostatnych maperov. Kedy planujete celu zmenu vratit do povodneho stavu? Dakujem.

Hi, the iD editor is known for making dubious decisions and lead mappers into the wrong way. Its authors have their own notion of OSM. Sadly, I don't know why it is presented as the first editor for new mappers, maybe only due to its simplicity to use. But it should only be used for simple newbie edits, not mass conversion of whole cities as you have done.

I don't propose to revert the whole changeset, I am not familiar with the brand tagging. I can just revert part of it (the boutique and entrance changes) , if you agree.

I'm not familiar with the brand tagging and I don't know if setting something to 'the brand standard tags' will somehow inherit it to all nodes of that brand. I have never seen that yet. So for now, the specific tags (like cafeteria) needs to be added to all existing nodes. You have also added all the brand tags to all the shops of a particular brand.

So how did you determine the Panda shop is of the Panda Express brand? There is no website tag at that node. You haven't really answered this part.
Thanks.

Hi, sorry, but this changeset is completely wrong. You do not provide the source for your changes, but they do not match aerial imagery nor cadastral map, so I can only assume you used survey and GPS device. But it seems it was very imprecise and destroyed correct building shapes. GPS does not work precisely on slopes and in such narrow roads between buildings. Please do not use such imprecise sources to modify existing buildings in Slovakia which we import from cadastre office.
I hope at least the address changes are correct.
Thanks.