Ale nie je to dobre, netreba to ako multipolygon. Len spojit do jednej plochy. Neviem aka je na to operacia v editore iD, ale najdete to.

Tu na tomto mieste napr. skoda, ze nie je v OSM zapisana ta max.rychlost 40 na juhovychod na Brizitskej ulici. Ja sa venujem skor tomu, cestam a navigacii.

Ale ked sa specializujete na pamatniky ci sochy, to je tiez dobre. Naucite sa par pravidiel a bude to super, tie tiez mnohe chybaju.

Ano super.
Ale v tomto pripade ak je naozaj tam napisane "Lurdska jaskyna v Dubravke" a pouzivaju to na tej tabuli ako nazov, tak to je dobry nazov, lebo uz je to specifickejsie. To iste plati pre vsetky objekty, popis "kamenny kriz" asi nebude nazvom, ale napr. "Kamenny kriz pod Kolibou" uz by nazvom bol ak sa tak oficialne uvadza (nielen, ze sa to tam nachadza tak to tak niekto zapise do OSM). Zaujimavy priklad je "Biely kriz" v Raci, ktory tiez znie len genericky opisne, ale naozaj sa tak vola, aj cela oblast ci namestie. Dokonca su take dva, jeden pri elektricke, druhy na kopci v lese. Ale je to OK, ako nazov.

Hej, prioritne treba doplnat dolezitejsie veci, ale zase tato obec Velke Ulany uz tie hlavne veci ma (v centre Obecny urad, zdravotne str., kulturny dom, kostoly, hasici), tak uz zostavaju len taketo drobne detaily ako polovnici a je pekne ich pridat.

Ano, treba to spojit. Budova bola imoportovana z katastra (kapor2), ktoru ju mal z nejakych dovodov rozdelenu na tri casti, zrejme stala na troch parcelach. Ale supisne cislo budovy je tam len jedno.

"Wayside shrine" je toto"
osm.wiki/Tag:historic%3Dwayside_shrine

Ano takato Lurdska jaskyna je blizko, aj ked splnalo by to aj building=shrine, akurat tazko povedat ci je to budova. Ale ludia o tom stale diskutuju a nie je uplne jasne ako to klasifikovat:
osm.wiki/Talk:Tag:historic%3Dwayside_shrine#How_to_classify_wayside_statues_of_Virgin_Mary?

Mozeme to teda zatial nechat, len zase ten nazov je otazny, ci to nie je zase len opis.

Polovnicke zdruzenie:
osm.wiki/Tag%3Aoffice%3Dassociation
alebo
osm.wiki/Tag:club%3Dhunting
mozno podla toho nakolko je to formalna organizacia ci to ma nejake pravomoci (ako napr. Rybarsky zvaz).
V kazdom pripade, pridat len nazov v OSM nestaci, clovek si mozno podla toho nieco domysli, ale OSM udaje su aj na strojove spracovanie a ten z toho nezisti nic. Vzdy musi byt pridana aj nejaka hlavna znacka urcujuca typ objektu.

Tie ostatne teda opravim podla toho co ste napisali.

The change is OK, the road is there (I wanted to add it myself), just the type needs changing. I will fix it soon. Thanks

osm.org/node/10931987789 - is it a shrine or a statue (going by the name you added) ?

osm.org/node/10931987802 - we can change the "dinosaur" name into better tags.

osm.org/way/303225138 - what is this object "PZ"?

osm.org/node/10931987804 - what kind of place of worship? historic=wayside_shrine? building=shrine? building=chapel?

If this is named 'jaskyna' (cave), is it really as small as a wayside shrine? Isn't it a different kind of object?

Why are there 3 chapels "Kaplnka Sedembolestnej Panny Márie" in Macov attached to each other? Isn't that really one building that should be joined into one?

And please no 'access=unknown'. If you do not know what the access is, add fixme="verify access permission on this parking" so that other people can check the object and resolve the problem.
You also removed my 'fixme' task by adding the access road. Does it mean you understand Slovak language?

The roads around osm.org/way/225717193 are no service=drive-through ...

Thanks, I have also updated the area with my surveyed data. Good that the road is now fixed as navigations would really give strange instructions from those 2 parallel roads just 2 metres apart with different access restrictions.

Thanks, see osm.wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only

Also note that Google street view is forbidden to be used for OSM, so only add objects you have visited, or are visible in the allowed aerial imagery in your editor).

For the memorials and atworks, there are tags that can be used instead of putting a description into the name.
E.g. for the horse statue at osm.org/node/3827143367 I have added statue=animal (see e.g. osm.wiki/Key:statue) and artwork_subject=horse (see osm.wiki/Key:artwork_subject, looks like 'figurative' would be more proper value). Sometimes it is good to put the description into 'description' tag if tags cannot express the object fully yet, but maybe in future tags will become available (new ones are created /agreed upon constantly).

Hi, please always provide sources where you got your data from.

Also don't forget to quote your sources, as there are no details of the bar on its website. Also you could notice there is already a restaurant with almost same name (typoed) at this place which you could update instead of duplicate it.

"Take it or leave it" may be the attitude at Google maps, but OSM expects some data quality.

Also osm.org/way/1175906187 service=drive-through means something different (you should check wiki descriptions before using tags, e.g. osm.wiki/Tag:service=drive-through ). The splits of the path by 'other stuff' marked as a service road with less restictions than the parking parts does make even less sense.

I have photos from that place incidentally so I have noticed the errors and will fix that road. I just want you to understand so that you do not introduce such random invalid tagging elsewhere.

Yeah, it is blocked by cars, that probably park there illegally (blocking whole footway) thus it is not good to put that into OSM (even though OSM maps what is really on the ground, but cars standing on a footway does not mean official parking place or a parking aisle). Even if they parked there legally, it would be no parking aisle but a amenity=parking + parking=lane or something similar.

And you still haven't explained where all the other invalid access permission tags came from.

I see no name on the memorial from the photo. An object does not need to have a name in OSM, this is no Google maps. Instead you could have put the inscription text into the 'inscription' tag.

You cannot copy anything from Google maps as it is forbidden for OSM. Second, Google is a dump ground of random descriptions of objects put into names so it even is useless to copy anything from Google maps.

You must check the history of the objects in OSM you change. Here you would see that multiple people already tagged it that they do not know its name. A statue of a horse is a description or property of the object and can be described by proper tags (see e.g. osm.wiki/Key:statue), it is not its name. If there is indeed no name, there is a noname=yes tag for that.

Then I ask where does the name on osm.org/node/10936899407 come from?