These buildings look like towers, they do not comprise the bridge.

Please do not add fictional descriptive names to objects like osm.org/node/2924731426

The primary name (in 'name' tag) should be in local language, not English, unless it calls itself officially with English name.

Tesla punjač? Ok, maybe. But a small hut representing the whole nature reserve? That is really weird tagging. Considering the reserve is tagged already around the whole lake. Also how can a building be an entrance?

Thank you. Yes, fee=yes, would be a safe starting point :) But I do not go into mapping the parking zones. I just updated a few streets I have visited.

iD editor isn't the best for experienced mappers like you and also it contains known misleading tags (like the questionable 'permit' value) and also pushes its own invented tags.

Then it is your editor that stored dgu.hr in your changeset. If you used something else (like you surveyed there), you have to write it into the changeset so others can check.

Also, "approximating" traffic signs isn't the greatest, if you do not understand their meaning in Croatian law (nether do I). Like today the streets are signed differently as some parking zones with extensive descriptions on the sign that I rather do not try to interpret :)

So if you are adding motor_vehicle=permit tags, which authority gives out those permits and who can get them? Also, some of the streets have a traffic sign of vehicle=no, not just motor_vehicle, so I am really interested in your sources, as you constantly lie that they are dgu.hr, but you can't see traffic signs there.

Hi, how is this a bike path? You didn't tag any tags allowing bicycles on this path. How do you know from aerial photos, that this is a path for bikes?
If some Strava users cycle here, it does not make it legal.

It seems Diakovce village does not use street names in their addresses oficially, so please do not add addr:street tags.

To suhlasim, ale ako ste prisli na to, ze mate takto preverit tuto adresu.

Ten Vitalny svet je tiez divny, chodnik a zaroven aj kupalisko? Pritom tam ziadny bazen nie je zakresleny, len sauna.

Zdravim, ako ste prisli na to, ze na osm.org/way/105300151 treba opravit adresu? Je to asi spravne (aj ked v katastri je tam stale 15, ale to ma aj dom nalavo), len ze ci mate nejake kontrolne mechanizmy voci registru adries.

Bez vysvetlenia, takze revertujem. Pridali ste aj wikidata a je to spominane aj na wikipedii, ale suradnice ukazuju este o par domov dalej (cize su nepresne), takze ani odtial to nemate.
Inak z wikipedie sa nesmu kopirovat udaje do OSM, takze ak nemate lepsi zdroj na ten nazov, ide to vsetko prec.

Presunuli ste tie male budovy, ale ponechali ste na nich zdroj kapor2, cize kataster, pritom z katastra nie su, ale z Vasich zdrojov. Treba teda zdroj na kazdej budove zmenit na spravny, aby nedoslo v buducnosti k omylu, ze uz su z katastra (teda dost presne), a netreba ich upresnit.

Zase nejake pokusy? Dufam, ze ste tam boli, kedze zase ziadne zdroje.

healthcare=yes na budove vedla bazena znamena co? Je tam nejaky zdravotnik pre prvu pomoc? To sa asi znaci inak.

Ta pozorovacia veza pri skluzavkach je co? Kto tam pozoruje?

area:highway aj highway na jednom objekte nema zmysel resp. si to odporuje. Neviem co znamena posunutie vrstiev ale tie chodniky mate dost nepresne umiestnene oproti aktualne Orotfotomozaike.

Aby bol objekt zaroven outdoor_seating a aj highway=footway mi pride trochu divne. Ale ak je tam naozaj plocha chodnika, potom asi chyba area=yes.

A ake vlastne letecke snimky pouzivate? Vy mate lietadlo?