Hi, what is the exact traffic sign here? There is a gate blocking these roads so access=destination seems weird. Anyone who decides he has destination there can go there? You also marked the main street crossing the area but there are many other streets where this restriction would apply (as they are behind the gates).

Super, dakujem.

Zdravim, co su tie divne nazvy budov ako ?viditeľná hranica so slučkou"?

Zdravim, aky je zdroj tychto udajov? Lebo nazvy na Ortofotomozaike nevidite a ziadny iny zdroj neuvadzate.

Jasne, opravnenia vjazdu podla Ortofotomozaiky. To by ma zaujimalo aka je tam dopravna znacka, ked menite vehicle na motor_vehicle.

No tak ste sa vyhrali s miestnostami, ale chodnik k nim (ako osm.org/way/31691658/ ) ste vymazali, takze sa tam ludia nedostanu.

The company does not have BMW in its name, and of couse not in Russian when located in Slovakia.

osm.org/way/785909692 ozaj ma taky nazov?

A shelter is named after a wine making company? Maybe that is the operator? Or is the company somewhere close? Seems to be at Vtacikova cesta 9536/25

Zdravim, nezabudajte uvadzat zdroje. Na park obeti hraniciarov som nasiel VZN, ale tie dalsie neviem. Ak je to napisane na mieste, tak aspon 'survey'.
Taktiez uz teraz nesuhlasi novy nazov na wikidata,ktore je na objekte. Lebo jedno je park a druhe namestie, takze treba to rozlisit.

Taktiez nazov obchodu z fotiek Bingu nevidite, takze prosim uvadzajte skutocne zdroje.

Zdravim, na budove asi nebude napisana cela tato reklama, a ak aj ano, tak reklamy nemusime prepisovat do OSM. Staci nazov firmy a typ obchodu (co predavaju), co ste nezadali, lebo v texte nazvu to ziadny program nepochopi.

Zdravim, usek chodnika osm.org/way/904992914 nie je vidiet ani v roku 2023 na Ortofotomozaike SR. A uz uplne je divne, aby chodnik prechadzal cez ploty do priemyselneho arealu na ulicu Pri majeri. O co tu ide?

Yes, 'disused:' could be close to 'disabled:'. But 'was:' is clearly wrong.
'disabled' only refers to disabled people when used as a key (at least on osm.wiki/Key:disabled), not as a key prefix.
Still 'disabled:' and 'disused:' may have slightly different meaning. You again wrongly mean 'lights are not used ANY MORE'. But in reality, the lights are 'not used YET'. In such case prefixes like 'proposed:' or 'construction:' could be handy, but they again do not convey the information that the lights are already fully built, just not enabled/used.

These small roads are clearly visible on aerial imagery (like ESRI or Ortofotomozaika SR) as finished (no construction around them). So I will remove the access=no as even though the roads are oneway and end in a dead-end (noexit=yes) in a field, but e.g. pedestrians can go there as they can ignore oneway signs.

Why this change? The traffic signals are still there, just turned off (when you did this change). They are actually enabled at this time. So it was never true that they were unrecoverably removed, which would justify tagging with 'was:'. 'disabled' and 'was' have different meaning. Yes, 'disabled' may be undocumented, which is another reason you should not touch it if you don't know what the original mapper meant.

You provide no source of your change so if you just did a random automatic edit without visiting the place, please refrain from doing such again.

Why are the roads like osm.org/way/995511822 access=no? What traffic sign is there?

Zdravotne stredisko uz je zakreslene ako cela budova. Takze tento nazov je duplicitny.

Zdravim, chodniky popri tychto cestach su uz zakreslene samostatnymi ciarami. V takom pripade sa na cestu dava sidewalk=separate (ze su zakreslene samostatne), nie 'both' (akoby cesta este mala dalsie postranne chodniky okrem tych zakreslenych). Taktiez je potom zbytocne sidewalk:surface (je to duplicita k hodnotam surface=* na jednotlivych chodnikoch).

Zdravim, oba potencialne bunkre, co ste nepomenovali, su podla wikidat zaniknute. Obe miesta poznam a podla mna tam nic nie je.