Hi, what are you trying to add here? There is no such track road on Ortofotomozaika 2020-2022 . In newer version from 2023 there is some track, but it does not connect to the service roads in the rest area .

Uz som to dal v iD zmenit.

V presetoch JOSM to nie je, takze mi je divne co ste odklikli. A teda treba na to davat pozor, v OSM ma byt napis ako je na objekte, aby to aj cudzinci spoznali. Aj tak mozu mat problem s odlisnymi velkymi pismenami, ale to je dalsi level na riesenie v buducnosti.

Yes, so the platform name is often the same as the stations name except on some very large stations. The platforms within the same station have the same name, but may differ in platform number, which you
have correctly put into local_ref.
See also osm.wiki/Tag:public_transport%3Dplatform .
So what is wrong there?

So it seems the Organic maps app add those postcodes automatically? Please configure it so that it does not do that.

Davam to tak vtedy, ked sa nezmeni typ prevadzky, napr. je to stale restauracia. Povodny nazov mozu ludia stale poznat a hladat.

Historiu objektu vidia len editori OSM, bezni pouzivatelia v aplikaciach vymazane znacky uz nevidia, nedopracuju sa k nim. Takze toto nepovazujem za vhodny zdroj pre nich.

Ano, ale ta skola sice moze mat sidlo v jednej budove, ale moze jej patrit cely areal.

osm.wiki/Tag:landuse%3Deducation
sa pouziva ked je v areali viac skol a nedaju sa rozdelit na samostatne uzemia amenity=school (ale oznacia sa len jednotlive budovy, ci body kde zhruba su dane skoly). Ked je len jedna skola tak landuse=education vobec nie je potrebne, na celom areali je amenity=school.

Hi, the Russian embassy changes are completely wrong. You changed correct tags of 'country' and 'embassy' into invalid values.
Also the 'embassy' tag on all the added embassies is wrong, please do not invent your own values.

Zdravim, preco tie zmeny skoly? Preco zmena na landuse=education? Nebol tam prekryv dvoch skol. Komu teraz patri telocvicna ci jedalen?

Hi, what do you think cycleway=link means? Your usage here does not seem to match the description at osm.wiki/Key:cycleway .

Zdravim, vacsina usekov cyklopruhov po Hlavnej ulici nie je nejako fyzicky oddelena od pruhov pre auta, takze nebolo potrebne ich znacit ako samostatne cesty.

Why are roads like osm.org/way/1030542227 and osm.org/way/156345618 unclassified?

You also added some traffic signals for cars like osm.org/node/12544098823, but left crossing as uncontrolled (no signal) for pedestrians across the same roads (even when there are fixme tags asking when the signals get enabled.
This is quite conflicting.

You also added a give_way sign at osm.org/node/12174233665 while there is also a traffic signal built. Is that one not enabled, even though the others are?

Hi, you did some fine work here, this roundabout needed some improvement as it is newly built. There is also an OSM note about it in the middle of the roundabout. Also thanks for not damaging the bus routes passing the roundabout.

However, why do you think this is how this kind of roundabout is mapped? Is there any agreement for this? As usually you do not draw each traffic lane as separate OSM way. I understand they lead to different exits and have different turn possibilities, but that can also be expressed differently.

And why did you change the part of Slovnaftska street around osm.org/way/610692908 as unclassified?

Dakujeme, ale prosim neposuvajte body kde sa cesty rozvetvuju na nespravne pozicie (napr. osm.org/node/8485807419 ). Oddelenie ma byt az kde je nemozne odbocit, je tam fyzicka zabrana alebo uz uplne rozdelene cesty srafovanim. Nie len obycajna plna ciara. Pozrite osm.wiki/Lanes#Motorway_with_lanes_and_destinations .

Tiez uvadzajte zdroj udajov, lebo pridavate velmi specificke udaje ako railway=owner_change, ktore zrejme ani nie su vidiet na mieste.

Zdravim, nepridavajte railway=crossing na miesta, kde je prechod zakazany (napr. zakonom) a este je to aj v OSM zapisane, napr. osm.org/node/1717939944 .

Aj napriklad osm.org/way/75219850 nie je building=garage podla definicie v OSM, mozno tak building=garages. Chapem, ze to mozno register nerozlisuje. Ale bude treba s tym nejako nalozit a nie to teda naslepo importovat do OSM, tak ako mnohe ine typy budov, co sme uz identifikovali ako problemove.

Sadly, all the changes are wrong here. The touched public transport stops are served by trolleybuses, not buses. And the English name of the Retia medical centre is just made up by you. Or what is the source?

Preco ste odobrali aj bicycle=no, ked pisete o bicycle=yes ?

What is the point of this change? Just adding postcodes on random shops? We already have postcodes on addresses in the building and also whole postcode boundaries in the city.

These changes are unneded.

Please do not add a standalone addr:postcode on random shops, there are better addresses nearby.

And finally stop with the bogus changeset description of "The triangle is not valid" !